Politics, apparently, has ways of making one losing one's senses, a problem suffered even by lawyers supposedly well-trained in rationality and pragmatism.
One example of this was on full display this week when former independent legislator Su Ying-kuei (
Su, a lawyer, then admitted he had no proof to substantiate his claim.
Indeed, he appeared rather confused and at a loss for words when attempting to explain his theory to reporters at a press conference on Tuesday. This didn't stop him from implying the judiciary was incompetent or corrupt, or both.
True, there are people who still harbor doubts about the March 19 shooting. But a lawyer should not be in the business of relaying rumors.
In Su's case, however, it seems too much to expect a calm assessment of all of the available evidence.
What Su has done is expose his ignorance of the judicial system and reveal his delight in trashing the efforts of prosecutors and police as he misleads the public and brings the judiciary into disrepute.
Su's credibility was already tarnished when he claimed in 2004 that two grand justices had called him seeking to influence his judgment on the March 19 Shooting Truth Investigation Special Committee Statute (
But Su refused to name the justices. Though the fuss over the matter has died down, the reputations of the sitting grand justices remain vulnerable to such irresponsible behavior.
If Su is really so enthusiastic about this case, should he not then give his so-called "video footage" to the investigation team, rather than toying with the media by feeding the press a couple of pictures a day?
One can only assume that Su has larger motives.
Though he has declined to comment on whether he has his eye set on the year-end Kaohsiung mayoral race, it is only sensible to wonder whether bamboozling the public in this manner will bolster his political career.
If Su does run for mayor and wishes to impress the good people of Kaohsiung, he would do well to ponder US president Lyndon Johnson's reputed comment: "I may not know much, but I know the difference between chicken shit and chicken salad."
With the Criminal Investigation Bureau subsequently holding a press conference rejecting Su's claims, Su should put up or shut up: Give us some real evidence or apologize for irresponsible accusations and unscrupulous smearing of the country's judiciary.
The members of Chen Yi-hsiung's family are human. Su ought not to cash in on their suffering and vulnerabilities by putting them on the media frontline in the absence of credible evidence.
If Su destroys his credibility entirely, the nation will barely suffer. But the nation stands to lose much more if the judiciary's credibility, respect and authority are undermined as a result of Su and people like him being given any more oxygen than they deserve.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.