On Feb. 28, 1995, former president Lee Teng-hui (
It is 11 years since Lee made that speech. Has the ethnic divide resulting from historical events been mended? Have different ethnic groups reached a consensus on a common goal? No.
Last Sunday, the government-funded 228 Memorial Foundation published a report entitled The 228 Incident: A Report on Responsibility. The title alone tells us that its objective is to assign responsibility for the 1947 massacre. The report generated much public debate prior to its release, especially since it says that former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) was the prime culprit behind the 228 Incident. Many people believe that the release of the report is only going to put the cat among the pigeons instead of allaying ethnic conflict.
Is it really so easy to maintain social calm that all we have to do is ignore a debate over who was responsible for past rights or wrongs? Is it better that we all develop a case of collective amnesia so that as soon as the 228 Incident is mentioned, we say "historic tragedy" -- as if that means that there are no perpetrators, that victims only need compensation and that society at large can find solace and redemption simply in the word "tragedy."
For a society with no understanding of tragedy, that kind of redemption is far too cheap.
Following the collapse of the East German regime in 1989, the East's Ministry of State Security (Stasi) shredded all classified files. The German government then commissioned an organization to reconstruct the 16,000 sacks of shredded Stasi files through advanced computer reconstruction systems.
By 2009, more than 600 million pieces of torn-up files will have been pieced back together and normal people and politicians who worked for or had connections with the Stasi may well come to light. The German federal government is footing the whole bill -- a total of 60 million euros (US$71.3 million) -- for this mammoth jigsaw puzzle.
The Germans clearly do not fear that such a move will incite hatred. To them, the responsibility of perpetrators and the rehabilitation of victims cannot be dealt with simply by the word "tragedy."
How can a historical assessment built on legal concepts not founded in constitutionalism, and conclusions such as "cultural differences" and "differences in understanding" give our children a view of history based on democratic and juridical concepts?
According to the most basic principles of democracy and constitutionalism, a government is mandated by the people. The government maintains social order as specified in the Constitution and its subordinate legal system, and it executes its measures through judicial proceedings.
In what way did the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) government's actions follow the above standards during 228?
A nation's armed forces are supposed to deal with its enemies -- did Chiang's government really see Taiwan as an enemy state and its people as enemies? How can a government turn its army on its people and then shirk responsibility in a country practicing democracy and the rule of law?
The time has come to attempt to assign responsibility. Rather than muddling and doing away with the memories of past ethnic conflict, we should face these memories based on the principles of democratic constitutionalism.
Lee Fu-chung is an associate professor at the Graduate Institute of Taiwan History at National Chengchi University.
Translated by Daniel Cheng
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) trip to China provides a pertinent reminder of why Taiwanese protested so vociferously against attempts to force through the cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014 and why, since Ma’s presidential election win in 2012, they have not voted in another Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate. While the nation narrowly avoided tragedy — the treaty would have put Taiwan on the path toward the demobilization of its democracy, which Courtney Donovan Smith wrote about in the Taipei Times in “With the Sunflower movement Taiwan dodged a bullet” — Ma’s political swansong in China, which included fawning dithyrambs