Besides commemorating the 228 Incident, what other lessons can we learn from this tragedy? The atrocities committed by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) should be condemned, but the government should take more concrete actions to solve the problems left by this "systematic slaughter" and disseminate the truth more widely.
Paying compensation to the victims and their relatives, however, is not the best way to heal the wounds of this trauma. Since the recently released The 228 Incident: A Report on Responsibility confirms that Chang Kai-shek (蔣介石) and other former KMT leaders were responsible for the 228 Incident, the government should bring the party to justice as soon as possible. Only by doing so can justice be achieved.
The report, however, cannot easily influence those people brainwashed by the KMT. In order for more Taiwanese people to understand our past, the government should make an effort to promote the viewpoints of this report. One way would be to put the truth of the 228 Incident into the "Grades 1-9 Curriculum Guidelines" for students' human rights education.
The government should also let the international community know about this history. Many of my foreign friends who care about Taiwan have asked me where they can get the English translation of this report. The 228 Memorial Foundation should translate the report into English, Japanese, German and other languages. It must also update the official English Web pages relative to this event.
The 228 Incident should not be a massacre in which there were only victims but no murderers. The KMT must admit its guilt, sincerely apologize to the Taiwanese and be fairly judged.
The truth of the 228 Incident should be widely publicized so that people here and abroad will be able to understand the history of this nation based on the standpoint of Taiwanese, not that of the KMT or China.
Su Yen-pin
Yungho
In 1947, after the 228 Incident, Chiang Kai-shek sent a massive number of troops from China to Taiwan to "suppress riots"; tens of thousands of the local elite were killed. This year, after the cessation of the National Unification Council (NUC) and unification guidelines was announced, Chinese President Hu Jintao (胡錦濤) described Taiwan's announcement as "gravely provocative." Is history to be repeated?
The 228 Incident and the scrapping of the NUC are part of the Taiwanese struggle for freedom and democracy against first, the KMT, and second, the Chinese Communists. What makes the Taiwanese people feel sad is that many KMT members in Taiwan are helping their former enemy try to annex Taiwan. They are like "house rats biting hemp bags" (a Taiwanese metaphor).
In the late 1940s, these people fled to Taiwan to escape communism. Today, they want to import communism to Taiwan.
KMT Chairman Ma Ying-jeou (
When Chen attended the 228 Memorial ceremony on Tuesday, he repeatedly asked "Have I done something wrong to announce the cessation of the NUC?" In unison, the audience shouted "No." The victims of the 228 Incident now in heaven seemed to echo the audience who were honoring them. They also shouted that they had done nothing wrong in 1947.
The global trend is toward freedom, democracy and self-determination. There is no way for Taiwan to go against this trend. Bad history should not be repeated.
Charles Hong
Columbus, Ohio
On a mournful occasion where there are victims, but no culprits, the mourning is empty.
Of course the KMT, given its usual unwillingness to assume responsibility for its actions, shows the same attitude about the 228 Incident. Former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) apologized when he headed the KMT administration, but that was because he is a Taiwanese who feels compassion for the suffering of fellow Taiwanese.
Had Taiwan still been led by a KMT president of Mainlander descent, there would have been no apology. Just see how Ma Ying-jeou has tried to avoid this subject as much as possible.
How about Taiwan-born Legislative Speaker Wang Jin-pin (王金平)? He doesn't have the guts to initiate social justice.
The People's Republic of China (PRC) is ruthless in its treatment of its own people -- such as Falun Gong members, Tibetans and land owners who are forced to give up their land so factories can be built.
The way the PRC sees Taiwan now is the same way the KMT viewed Taiwan some 60 years ago -- those islanders' lives mean nothing. The Taiwanese people must not have any illusions that they will be treated fairly by the PRC.
Congratulations on the publication of The 228 Incident: A Report on Responsibility.
Justina Wang
Chicago, Illinois
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with