Very little prodding is usually needed to get your average Taiwanese upset about the state of the economy. And considering the state of Taiwan's economy, this pervasive financial dourness often seems to border on the obsessive. Economically speaking, things are not terrible -- decent economic growth, low unemployment, good wages and reasonable prices -- although they could, of course, be much better.
Part of this gloomy mentality hinges on the inevitable comparisons with the lumbering giant on the other side of the Taiwan Strait. Talk about economics in Taiwan, and it won't be long before someone speaks about China's rapidly growing GDP with a wishful reverence.
This doe-eyed adulation of the "China market" is not unique to Taiwan -- or to history, for that matter. Pick up any financial newspaper -- or peruse the correspondence of diplomats from the 1850s -- and you'll find florid enthusiasm about the economic promise of China gushing from virtually every page. History will be the judge as to whether this enthusiasm was misplaced.
And so it goes in Taiwan. As you hear about China's wondrous economic might, one can't help but think that GDP growth is merely a single component in a very complicated formula for economic success. So it is natural to want to point out that China still has a long way to go before most Chinese can afford to buy even the most basic computer.
Therein lies the problem with comparing the economies of China and Taiwan: The two have very little in common. The challenges facing China's financial planners and government officials are not the same as those facing Taiwan.
But when Taiwanese complain that all the companies are moving to China, it is hard not to have a more sympathetic ear. When textile workers take to the streets in anger because they are losing out to cheap Chinese towels (of all things), it is hard not to share some of their resentment. But then one starts to wonder: Why would these people ever think that they could compete with Chinese textile makers? It simply doesn't make any sense. Chinese labor costs a pittance compared to Taiwanese labor, even in Yunlin County.
It is with some bemusement that one regards the signs held by the protesting workers asking the government to save "jobless workers." After all, Taiwan's unemployment rate was 3.8 percent in January -- the lowest in years, and a figure most developed economies could only dream of attaining. But rather than simply writing off these textile workers as a bunch of protectionist spoil-sports, it is better to consider the real problem: the government's inability to make proactive economic policies.
Every indication is that the government will deal with the "Towel Fight" in the same way it deals with every cross-strait trade issue: with a healthy dose of ineffectual protectionism. This doesn't address the need to develop a strategy for the economic future. And there seems to be a real confusion about what the government wants Taiwan's economy to be.
First it was to be "Taiwan, the silicon island," to compete with Silicon Valley. Then, it was to be "Taiwan, the regional financial hub," to compete with Singapore. Then it was to be "Taiwan, the regional transport hub" to compete with Hong Kong. Even Vice President Annette Lu (
So what is Taiwan to be? It will never be able to compete head-to-head with China in textiles, heavy industry or electronics manufacturing -- or any other labor-intensive sector. Research and development, design, engineering -- industries in the service sector are the obvious choice.
Towels are not.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under