The US Pacific Command and the People's Liberation Army (PLA) of China have quietly begun an exchange of military officers that is intended to reduce the chances of a miscalculation leading to hostilities between the established power in the Pacific and the rising power of East Asia.
A delegation of 20 senior Chinese officers visited Hawaii, where the Pacific Command has its headquarters, and Alaska, which is within the command's area of responsibility, last November. A group of Chinese specialists in military personnel came last month. The first US delegation is scheduled to go to China next month.
The commanding officer of the Pacific Command, Admiral William Fallon, said in an interview that this has been a "significant engagement." Most US military exchanges with China were cut off in 1989 after Chinese troops killed unknown numbers of democracy advocates in Tiananmen Square.
Those exchanges resumed during former president Bill Clinton's administration in the 1990s but were conducted mainly by high-level defense officials and military officers. After US President George W. Bush came to office in 2001, Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld ordered a review of the entire program.
Almost everything stopped in April of that year after a Chinese fighter pilot clipped a US EP-3 surveillance plane over the South China Sea. The Chinese plane spiraled into the sea while the US plane made an emergency landing on Hainan Island.
Since then, senior officials of the Bush administration have been skeptical of renewing military exchanges with China, arguing that they do not benefit the US. Many military officers, however, have contended that well-done exchanges would deter the Chinese once they were informed of US capabilities and intentions.
Fallon said the Chinese officers in the current exchanges, who are the first operational officers representing the next generation of military leaders to come to the US, had arrived with "a very high desire to learn" as they didn't know much about the US armed forces beforehand.
A US staff officer who dealt with the Chinese during their visit confirmed that, saying "they didn't know anything about America except what they learned from Hollywood." US officers said they thought they had been able to correct some of the mistaken impressions held by the Chinese, most of whom were making their first trip abroad.
The first group of 20 Chinese officers, led by Major General Zhang Wenda (
The officers were mostly one-star brigadier generals but their responsibilities, as brigade commanders for instance, were those of US colonels, one grade below. Each Chinese was paired with an American, five of whom spoke Chinese, through the week-long stay. Four Chinese spoke English.
To set an example, Fallon instructed US officers to be as open as possible, without divulging secrets, in answering Chinese questions. US military leaders, from Bush down, have long complained that the Chinese lack "transparency" in everything from military spending to troop training.
The Chinese were briefed not only at the Pacific Command headquarters, but at the Pacific Air Force and Pacific Fleet headquarters in Hawaii and at the army's command post in Alaska, a five hour flight from Honolulu. US officers said the Chinese were surprised by the vast area for which the Pacific Command is responsible.
US officers said they were ready to respond to Chinese questions about strategy but found the Chinese not prepared to discuss issues at that level. Instead, they focused on tactical questions such as how long it took to begin moving a brigade (18 hours) and how a US colonel controlled his brigade.
The Chinese enjoyed dining with US soldiers in Alaska and looking at their two-and three-man rooms in a new barracks, which are far more comfortable than the spartan barracks in China. They went on a shopping spree at the Pearl Harbor base exchange and bought out the inventory of Chanel No. 5 perfume.
"If you go to China and catch a whiff of Chanel No. 5," said a US officer, "that's probably a PLA wife."
When the Chinese arrived, Fallon said, "they were full of propaganda" about how the US was seeking to surround and contain China. US officers who dealt with the Chinese thought they had been able to persuade them that the US intended China no harm -- but would use military power, if necessary to defend US interests.
"We think they went away with a good balance," one said.
The second group of Chinese, the specialists in personnel, wanted to know what US military people are paid. When they were told that a US colonel made US$11,540 in pay and allowances, a Chinese said: "That's a year, right?"
"No," replied his American counterpart, "that's a month."
The Chinese was evidently stunned.
During their visit, the Chinese were taken to the USS Arizona memorial above the battleship sunk by the Japanese in their surprise attack of Dec. 7, 1941, which brought the US into World War II. The ship still rests on the bottom of Pearl Harbor, reflecting perhaps the greatest defeat in US history.
About 183m downstream, however, sits the battleship USS Missouri aboard which the Japanese surrendered to end World War II on Sept. 2, 1945. It reflects a distinct triumph of US arms. US officers said they thought the Chinese had gotten the message.
"You do bad stuff to us," a US officer said, "and bad stuff happens to you."
Richard Halloran is a writer based in Hawaii.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) trip to China provides a pertinent reminder of why Taiwanese protested so vociferously against attempts to force through the cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014 and why, since Ma’s presidential election win in 2012, they have not voted in another Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate. While the nation narrowly avoided tragedy — the treaty would have put Taiwan on the path toward the demobilization of its democracy, which Courtney Donovan Smith wrote about in the Taipei Times in “With the Sunflower movement Taiwan dodged a bullet” — Ma’s political swansong in China, which included fawning dithyrambs