As Taiwan discussed the new cross-strait economic and trade policies suggested by President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) in his New Year address, the US Congress held similar hearings to discuss economic and trade policies with China in a search for its own version of "active management."
The reason behind the hearing was a report from the US Department of Commerce saying that the US trade deficit has reached US$700 billion, a year-on-year increase of 17 percent. Imports were 60 percent greater than exports and it is estimated that the deficit will reach US$800 billion by the end of this year.
Many US academics ascribe the massive trade deficit to rising energy prices and an imbalance in trade with China. The US trade deficit with China reached US$200 billion last year, a 20 percent increase on the previous year. The money that China has earned in one year of trade with the US is equal to one-quarter of its total US$800 billion foreign exchange reserve.
With Chinese President Hu Jintao (胡錦濤) scheduled to visit the US in April, the debate about the US trade deficit with China is getting increasingly loud. US Trade Representative Rob Portman has pointed out that China still raises obstacles to the import of US products, which shows that Beijing is not living up to promises it made when entering the WTO. Since the election of US President George W. Bush, the deficit with China has more than doubled.
An even louder debate is going on in the US Congress. Last week, Democratic Senator Byron Dorgan and Republican Senator Lindsey Graham submitted a joint bill asking that China be stripped of its Permanent Normal Trade Relations (PNTR) status. They feel that the enormous trade deficit shows that the US' China trade policy is an unbelievable failure.
Five years ago, Congress approved PNTR status for China. The bill submitted by Dorgan and Graham wants to strip China of that status so that it is reviewed annually and can be withdrawn or extended depending on the situation. The two senators believe that since the US is the world's largest market, controls on Chinese products entering the US market can be used as leverage to force China to follow fair trade rules.
During the administration of former president Bill Clinton, the US helped China enter the WTO and gain PNTR status. Clinton believed that expanded trade could force the Chinese government to reform. The changes over the past five years, however, show that not only has China not moved toward democracy, but instead it has moved toward increasing its military strength and that Hu is more despotic than his predecessor. The cross-party bill is an expression of doubt about something that has been wishful thinking all along.
Not long ago, Graham and Democratic Senator Charles Schumer submitted a joint bill requiring the US to levy a 27.5 percent import tax on Chinese products unless the yuan was allowed to appreciate. The vote on the bill was postponed after China's decision to let the yuan appreciate by 2.1 percent. Schumer said in a statement that the trade deficit with China was tantamount to slitting the US' wrists and letting it slowly bleed to death. Unless China takes certain measures, the senators may resubmit the bill.
The US will hold mid-term elections this year to elect one-third of the Senate and all House representatives. To win over voters, both Democratic and Republican senators may take a tougher line on trade issues, and Bush will also pay attention to such issues if he wants to maintain his party's majority in both the Senate and Congress.
It seems Hu will have his hands full during his US visit.
Cao Changqing is a writer based in New York.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry