The fever that gripped oil markets in recent weeks has begun to subside as traders discount the likelihood of a doomsday scenario in Iran, yet many remain cautious due to a variety of geopolitical risks.
Crude oil prices have slumped to their lowest levels of the year after spiking at US$69.20 per barrel in New York on Jan. 23, near the all-time highs of US$70.85 in August 2005 after Hurricane Katrina.
New York's main contract, light sweet crude for delivery in March, lost US$0.78 to close on Friday at US$61.84.
The possibility of international sanctions on Tehran and a cutoff of Iranian oil has been plaguing the market amid growing concerns about Iran's nuclear energy program.
Iran is the fourth-largest oil producer, pumping some 3.9 million barrels a day, according to US Department of Energy data for last month. Of that, some 2.7 million barrels per day are exported.
"The worst-case scenario assumes that a military strike against Iran would occur late in the year," said Diane Swonk, economist at Chicago-based Mesirow Financial.
But Swonk and others argue that Iran needs oil revenues as much as the world needs Iranian oil.
"Iran counts on oil revenues to fund 90 percent of their government spending and therefore cannot afford to give up those revenues for any length of time," Swonk said.
For BMO Nesbitt Burns analyst Bart Melek, the downward price trend came "as the market started to feel increasingly comfortable that there are sufficient inventories to compensate for any potential production losses from Iran."
Even if the UN imposes sanctions, Melek said he expected that any such move "would no doubt keep oil from Iran flowing in order to get China [which holds a veto and imports 10 percent of its oil from Iran] to agree."
Yet prices remain at historically high levels, and many market participants are not willing to throw out the "risk premium" due to concerns about Iran and elsewhere.
"Considering the heights from which the market has fallen, recent declines are quite small when viewed proportionally," said Mike Fitzpatrick at Fimat USA. "The political realities have not changed all that much. Iran has gotten a month's reprieve. Iran has already suffered through economic sanctions, imposed by the US since the late '70s."
Fitzpatrick noted that Iran has threatened "consequences" if sanctions are imposed, "even though they keep denying that oil will be withheld from the market."
As a result, the analyst said he believes "that the recent fall in prices is only a correction, and the three-year-old rally should continue shortly."
Stephen Auth at Federated Investments said it was not just Iran, but that "geopolitical tensions are running unusually high around the world, particularly in oil-producing regions."
Auth said oil supplies could be affected by strife or political change in Sudan, Russia, Nigeria and Latin America -- not to mention the Palestinian situation that may affect some Middle East oil producers.
"The higher level of geopolitical risk is likely to be transmitted to financial markets via energy prices," Auth said. "In fact, much of the recent strength in oil prices seems to trace to nations attempting to build up oil reserves to offset the risk of a sudden supply disruption."
While the situation is hard to predict, Auth said he did not expect a new oil shock.
"That's not what we expect. But in such a case, it wouldn't surprise us to see oil spike into the $US90 range," he said. "We think the more likely outcome is for oil to remain in the US$55 to US$65 range."
Nariman Behravesh, chief economist at research firm Global Insight, said "the tripling of oil prices since early 2002 is almost entirely due to fundamental market forces, including the near-elimination of spare capacity in OPEC. Basically, the demand for energy has been growing faster than the supply."
He said the risk premium is about US$5 to US$10 per barrel, but that a crisis could "potentially push prices as high as US$100 a barrel for a few months."
But Behravesh said that historical trends suggest oil prices will eventually retreat, and possibly quicker than many are expecting.
"Global Insight expects that it could take 10 years or longer. But history shows that market forces always have a powerful effect on commodities ... often with a lag, and sometimes with a vengeance," he said.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under