British prime minister Winston Churchill once spoke of Communist nations as existing behind an "iron curtain." China was later seen as being isolated behind a "bamboo curtain." But that is all in the past now that China is gradually opening up to the world. But despite economic liberalization, China is still subject to a closed political system that exercises harsh control over society. It is a world in which there are many hidden dangers, and those unwary enough to transgress can find themselves subject to imprisonment or worse.
The Internet espouses a spirit of borderless communications and freedom, but China is one of a small number of countries that insists on setting boundaries. Superficially, members of China's Internet community are free to search for whatever they want. But when using the Google search engine, they will be unable to find information on certain topics. You are free to set up a Web log (blog) and air your opinions, but you may well find that your blog is suddenly and inexplicably closed down. Those who assume that their Internet presence is anonymous may suddenly discover records of their transactions across the Internet used as evidence against them. On the Internet, the Chinese government is an omnipresent Big Brother, and in a cyberspace without borders, it has set up a "cyber curtain."
That China has been able to create this "cyber curtain" is not a reflection of its extensive power, but due rather to the connivance of the world's major Internet companies, who have provided the means for China to keep a tight rein on freedom of speech on the Internet. Google openly expressed its willingness to cooperate with the Chinese government, and Google staff have secretly connived with Chinese officials to ensure that certain search terms, which the government finds objectionable, will not turn up any results. Last year, Internet giant Yahoo provided information that helped the Chinese government to sentence "dissidents" Shi Tao (
These leading Internet companies claim to espouse freedom and openness yet, in order to win access to the China market, they have seen fit to bow to pressure from Beijing. In doing so, they have sold out fundamental values. Human-rights organizations, Reporters without Borders and the international media, which all uphold freedom of speech, have harshly criticized the behavior of these firms.
The struggle between money and values that these companies have entered into is a terrible one. The world's most popular Internet portal site, Yahoo, has stated that it is "deeply concerned" by some governments' efforts to control access to the Web, and hopes that the "cyber curtain" can be torn down.
But the company is not so naive as to believe that any company, whatever its size or share price, can resist pressure applied by the Chinese government. That's why the firm has announced that it will cooperate with Internet, media and communications companies, and the US government, to resist efforts by the Chinese government to monitor Internet traffic. This is a late awakening, but it is certainly better than staying asleep.
This battle against the pernicious affects of the cyber curtain will be fought on the keyboards and in the minds of every free individual. Every free person should write to the media and to their government to support freedom of speech; every person, organization and nation should express repugnance at China's violation of human rights, and call for the ripping down of China's "cyber curtain."
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations