Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Ma Ying-jeou (
In a recent interview with Newsweek magazine, Ma sidestepped the question of when unification would take place by saying the conditions are "not ripe yet."
This answer is rather ambiguous to say the least. Is this an admission that China has not yet achieved democracy, or a realization that he would be about as popular as former president Lee Teng-hui (
When it comes to cross-strait relations it seems that Ma is learning the same cross-strait trick that the US has been performing for such a long time, the "no changes to the status quo" balancing act. That means that Taiwan can neither implement policies or take action without first getting the approval of Washington. Meanwhile, China enacts its "Anti-Secession" Law, forces a downgrading of Taiwan's status at the WTO and continues to build up the number of missiles aimed at Taiwan, without so much as a whisper from Capitol Hill. Yet a mere mention of constitutional change in President Chen Shui-bian's (陳水扁) New Year address apparently has Washington sweating about its effect on the all-important "status quo."
The Taiwan Relations Act (TRA), Washington's bible for its relationship with Taiwan, says that the US will "consider any effort to determine the future of Taiwan by other than peaceful means a threat to the peace and security of the Western Pacific area and of grave concern."
A referendum is about as peaceful as things get. The consensus of a nation's population in decision-making is in line with the principles of human rights and democracy that the US administration is usually so concerned about.The TRA goes on to say "Nothing contained in this Act shall contravene the interest of the US in human rights, especially with respect to the human rights of all the inhabitants of Taiwan. The preservation and enhancement of the human rights of all the people on Taiwan are hereby reaffirmed as objectives of the US." The freedoms of choice, to self-government and to adjust one's constitution are all basic human rights; the Taiwanese people should not be selectively denied any one of them.
In actual fact, the real meaning of the phrase "maintaining the status quo" is maintaining the political status quo, while the military and economic balance of power tilts in China's favor.
After Chen announced his new strategy for economic exchanges with China during his New Year address, Ma was also one of the first to criticize it, saying that "the government just can't figure out its policy priorities, and it pushes for constitutional re-engineering when what people want is a better economy." This is what it all boils down to in the end: economics. The correct path for Taiwan is the path that doesn't hurt international economic interests.
The pan-blue line is that full economic integration with China is the panacea for the nation's economic woes. But they are also aware that further integration with China will eventually take Taiwan to the point of no return, when the nation's sovereignty will have to be forfeited in the name of economic interests. This is something they would happily accept, as it would force the issue of Ma's stated aim: unification. They ignore the fact that a majority of the Taiwanese public do not want unification.
For evidence of the effect of economic integration on Taiwan's sovereignty, we have to look no further than the case of Chi Mei Optoelectronics founder Hsu Wen-long (
Some experts have talked about the recent poor performance of Taiwan's economy and point to the stock exchange and how badly it did last year compared to both Japan and South Korea's bourses, which rose by 53 percent and 42 percent, respectively. But they neglect to mention that Japanese and South Korean businesses have not invested nearly as much in China as Taiwan's, yet their economies continue to thrive. This may be because industries in these countries have concentrated on becoming successful global players, and have not ploughed every single investment dollar into China. Yet, Taiwanese businesses continue to increase their investment in China.
Any nation and its businesses should be aware of the old adage that says "don't put all your eggs in one basket." The US and many other countries have strategic investment plans and regulations that stop sensitive businesses from investing in "hostile" territory. It makes sense for Taiwan to refrain from relaxing its regulations any further.
China has not shown Taiwan one ounce of goodwill since Chen became president. Taiwanese businesspeople invest in China because it is culturally similar, close to home and easy for them to set up and run their new operations. It also means they can carry on making money for a few more years without any major new investment. Meanwhile many of these businesses lose their competitive edge as they allow the Chinese to gain their industrial secrets and know how.
The very fact that China seeks to promote trade relations with Taiwan while avoiding international conventions (as shown with the fruit exports) should have Taiwanese businesspeople worried, because they have no international agreements or framework to fall back on for arbitration purposes should they suffer some kind of business injustice or fraud. There are already too many tales of Taiwanese businesses that have suffered this fate. This cannot happen with trade disputes that occur with other countries, as investments in places such as India and Vietnam are protected by international law.
To become truly global players, Taiwanese companies need to develop operations globally and not get intoxicated with the "greater China dream." But the overriding issue in all of this is Taiwan and its sovereignty. Ma and the pan-blue camp can afford to do and say as they do because they do not believe Taiwan is a sovereign nation, and have already indicated they support eventual unification. They have nothing to lose. But Taiwan cannot afford to let a handful of economists, profit-hungry industrialists and politicians with ulterior motives decide the fortunes of its sovereignty. South Korea and Japan have already proved that an economy can survive and prosper without full-scale investment in China.
It is quite simple: The president's policy needs to be successfully implemented if Taiwan is to prevent further erosion of its economic strength and sovereignty.
Richard Hazeldine is a writer based in Taipei.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations