Ever since President Chen Shui-bian (
Ever since the DPP came to power, the strained relationship between Chen and Vice President Annette Lu (
Chen has been unable to get along with the succession of premiers he has had. Following in the footsteps of former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝), Chen holds the erroneous, and even unconstitutional, belief that he is the one calling the shots in matters relating to national defense, diplomacy and cross-strait relations.
In addition, he also tends to intervene in the formation of the Cabinet, preventing the premier from organizing his Executive Yuan team the way that he wants. If this situation persists, there are always going to be problems with the Cabinet.
In 2000, the DPP found themselves in a perfect situation with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) split by internal divisions, which placed Chen in an ideal position to wield the central government the way he wanted following his election. It also gave him almost unlimited power with which to expand his sphere of control. Unfortunately he failed to establish a sound and democratic decision-making mechanism, locking both the Executive Yuan and the DPP into a state of inaction.
The reality is that the DPP government is in Chen's grip, and its lack of competence in the governance of the country has meant that the Cabinet has lost its ability to govern. Because of these problems, the DPP's popularity ratings have also been declining.
When this poor performance is brought to light during major elections, Chen takes little or no responsibility, leaving the blame to the party or the Cabinet. After last month's local government elections, in which the DPP won less than half of the seats, Chen accepted the resignation of the DPP chairman. Yet it is precisely the fact that those in power are not held responsible for the government's failings that was the root cause of the DPP's defeat.
The DPP still can make a comeback and improve its image among the public in the two years before Chen's term ends in 2008. To accomplish this, Chen should consider what is best for the sustainable development of both his party and the nation, as well as conduct a thorough reform of the way power is used within the government.
He should stop his excessive intervention and allow the DPP and the Cabinet to exert their greatest efforts in helping the nation to thrive in every aspect. If Chen allows the government to perform its duties as it should, he will be able to better fulfil his own role.
Both DPP chairman-elect Yu Shyi-kun and Su should be the two people whom Chen trusts the most, in particular the premier. Whoever takes up the premiership should be someone whom Chen believes possesses the best administrative skills. Since Chen is supposed to trusts these men, he should not doubt them but let them do all they can to run the Cabinet and the DPP.
Yu joined the Taipei City Government toward the end of Chen's tenure as Taipei mayor. Since Chen came to power in 2000, Yu has twice served as the Presidential Office's secretary-general and he also became the longest serving premier during Chen's tenure. He has also served as DPP secretary-general.
Given his credentials and his personal connections with Chen, Yu has the chance break the impasse within the DPP, but he could just as well cause the party to continue to remain incapacitated. The crux of the matter is whether or not Yu can distance the party from Chen's inappropriate influence while maintaining good relations with the president.
The success of this endeavor will stand or fall on Yu's ability to initiate discussions between government and party and thus establish an effective model for collective decisionmaking.
In practice, it is the Cabinet that is implementing the policies of the central government. The president should allow the premier to select his own Cabinet members and the premier should seek to immediately establish a sound mechanism for the selection of Cabinet members.
The premier should gain an insightful understanding of his different ministerial candidates, their advantages and shortcomings and their suitability for their posts. He must not make his choices based on a superficial understanding and political relationships.
Recently, media outlets have implied that Chen, Yu and Su have formed a strong triumvirate. However, if they only intend to consolidate their power, that triumvirate will in the end fall apart. Only by letting the institutions of the Presidential Office, the Cabinet and the party -- instead of the three men -- run government affairs and implement policies in accordance with the spirit of democracy will it be possible to end the difficulties and create political hope.
Chiu Hei-yuan is a research fellow in the Institute of Sociology at Academia Sinica.
Translated by Daniel Cheng
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with