President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) was recently seen touting the results of an opinion poll that surveyed Taiwan's good image abroad, particularly with the EU's opinion leaders.
One can easily understand the importance of Taiwan's international reputation and its worldwide public relations battle with China, which is constantly trying to exclude Taiwan from as many international meetings and sports events as possible.
While there's no doubt that Europe's elite is aware of the progress Taiwan has made in terms of its democratization, it is at least as important to wonder what ordinary people in Europe think about Taiwan.
In a perfect world, Europeans should be the first to applaud Taiwan's transformation during the last 10 years. Free elections, respect for minorities and increasing women's role in the public sphere are all mainstream, fundamental concepts in the European political landscape, especially in Northern parts. Eastern European countries have also made this transition at pretty much the same time as Taiwan.
It seems natural that they would champion Taiwan's cause if they knew about it. And of course knowledge and support at the ground level would also influence European leaders when the time comes to make decisions favorable to Taiwan.
And first of all, what do Europeans know about Taiwan? Coverage of the presidential elections, such as the last one in 2004, is about the only time that Europeans [briefly] hear about the democratic nature of Taiwan. The rest of the time, tension between Taiwan and China regularly crops up in the news. It is explained by Taiwan's desire for independence.
It is safe to say that Taiwan is still better known for its economic progress [the ubiquitous "Made in Taiwan"] and its difficult relationship with China than for its democratic and societal achievements. It is not widely known that along with South Korea, Taiwan is the only real democracy in Asia. Nor has the Taiwanese government done much to change this.
Even though some efforts have been made in Taiwan to make it a world-class tourist destination, there has been no major international campaign on the scale of Malaysia's, for example (with the now famous slogan "Malaysia, Truly Asia").
Of course it's not easy for Taiwan to attend international exhibitions due to the pressures China constantly applies to have Taiwan excluded. But in the age of the information super-highway a physical presence is not always necessary to get your message across.
The international coverage of Taiwanese elections should be much wider, with Taiwan inviting more foreign correspondents. Also why doesn't Taiwan have an efficient English-language news channel to counter China's CCTV-9, as well as an English language press agency like Xinhua (which also distributes news in French, Spanish, Russian and Arabic)?
The information field could very well be where the battle to secure Taiwan's future is won.
All this could be crucial because the values embodied by modern Taiwanese society are held close to the heart of all Western societies. Taiwan's democratic system, at the national and local level, should be publicized more.
The move by Taiwan to recognize Aboriginal languages as official languages resonates in countries like France and Spain where recognition and teaching of regional languages has been a hotly debated topic in the last decade.
Taiwan's vibrant free press is also something to be noted when in many countries, the concentration of the media in the hands of a few corporation endangers freedom of speech.
Individual stories, regarding personalities such as Vice President Annette Lu (
It would seem logical for the Taiwanese government to engage in a vigorous and widespread public relations campaign across Europe. Taiwan shouldn't shy away from comparing itself to other Asian countries. While Japan is formally a democracy, the same party wins every election.
Taiwan's democracy is much closer to the European model, with a political life that alternates between the pan-green and pan-blue camps, just like many European countries alternate between left and right.
In the West, Israel has understood this and frequently describes itself as the only democracy in the Middle East.
One seldom hears the same comment applied to Taiwan. It could be emphasized by agencies representing Taiwan's business interests abroad. Something to the tune of "when you do business with Taiwan, you do business with a democratic country."
The individual stories of remarkable Taiwanese leaders should also be emphasized in order to humanize the country and distance it from the old 70s and 80s "Made in Taiwan" stigma, where Taiwan's reputation was as a maker of cheap toys and goods. It could also result in positive economic results.
In 2001, Representative Henry Hyde, chairman of the US House International Relations Committee, said that a "free and uncoerced Taiwan is of immense strategic importance to the US and to the world." It is of vital importance for Taiwan to have a European leader of Hyde's importance make a similar statement. For this to happen Taiwan must win the information battle and at last let Europeans know about the fantastic progress the country has made during the last 10 years. It is within Taiwan's reach.
Cezar Greif is the executive editor of Cool Hunt Inc, an international press agency based in Los Angeles.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry