In his New Year's address, President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) told the people of Taiwan that "although we cannot turn a blind eye to China's market, we should not view the China market as the only or the last market." In particular, Chen stressed that "`globalization' is not tantamount to `sinicization,'"and that Taiwan must not "`lock in' our economic lifeline and all our bargaining chips in China."
Chen's hard work has indeed been aimed at creating sustainable economic development for Taiwan. I wonder, however, if he has not mixed up the concept of "market" with the concept of "production" and neglected the complexities of the international division of labor across the Taiwan Strait, something that might cause Taiwan to miss the opportunity to build sustainable development.
Former vice minister of economic affairs Yin Chi-ming (
This statement is an idealistic description of Taiwanese and other foreign businesspeople investing in China. China is playing factory to the world, so of course Taiwanese and other foreign businesspeople want to take advantage of its cheap production resources.
But China is not the whole world market, it is merely a newly developing market with unlimited potential business opportunities where businesses from various countries are engaged in all-out competition. Today, a majority of products manufactured by foreign businesses investing in China are exported to the US, Japan and the EU, and they make up more than 50 percent of all China's exports.
The fact that Taiwanese businesspeople invest in production in China does not mean that China is Taiwan's "only or ... last market." The question of whether Taiwanese businesses see China as their best investment destination involves many factors.
From an economic perspective, Taiwanese businesses are certain to consider the risks, including the political risk, of doing business in China, and they may be clearer than even the Taiwanese government on where the real risks lie. The government's good will should be manifested by offering Taiwanese better information and risk assessments instead of restricting their investments.
Macroeconomically speaking, Taiwan's resources are limited and its domestic market is small. The economy of a growing Taiwan therefore requires the integration of global resources and global market operations. That is why China's cheap production factors and rapidly growing market offer a good opportunity for developing and transforming Taiwan into a platform for Asia-Pacific cooperation that integrates global resources.
"Globalization" and "sinicization" are not diametrically opposed concepts. Sometimes they work to reinforce each other. Just as Chen said in his New Year address, "The complex cross-strait economic and trade policies should not be simplified as a dichotomy of either `opening up' or `tightening up.'"
Seeing the competitive pressures and opportunities offered by globalization and in response to the goal of Taiwan's economic development, a "Greater Taiwan Economic Circle" (GTEC) could be established to function as a blueprint for Taiwan's development and avoid confusion between "globalization" and "sinicization."
The GTEC would turn Taiwan into a platform for the integration of economic resources in the Asia-Pacific region, as well as for products, services and value creation, including production factors such as manpower, capital, information, technology, intermediate goods, spare parts and components.
The GTEC would have four goals: to increase the efficiency with which Taiwan's economic resources are put to use; to expand the nation's economic scope; to improve productivity; and to promote Taiwan's technological and systemic innovation. The ultimate goal of the GTEC would of course be to promote investment in Taiwan by businesses from many countries, including Taiwan, and to improve the nation's economic growth.
To this end, making Taiwan a production base to attract international investment, using Taiwan as a platform for cooperation between industrialists from other countries, making Taiwan's production factors the target of international cooperation and treating Taiwan's products and services as part of international trade, will all serve to expand and deepen the GTEC, and promote prosperity in the investing countries.
The GTEC should of course also include China's production factors, products, services and markets as the motor of Taiwan's economic development to give it an advantage as a platform for Asia-Pacific economic integration. More concretely, Taiwan should become proactive instead of remaining passive. It should actively integrate the benefits of Taiwanese enterprises and foreign businesses and request that China guarantee, and work to improve, the benefits of the GTEC.
This is the opportunity that China offers a Taiwan that is moving toward globalization. Taiwan should grasp this chance instead of stubbornly rejecting it.
Tung Chen-yuan is an assistant professor in the Sun Yat-sen Graduate Institute of Social Sciences and Humanities at National Chengchi University.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.