In his New Year's address, President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) told the people of Taiwan that "although we cannot turn a blind eye to China's market, we should not view the China market as the only or the last market." In particular, Chen stressed that "`globalization' is not tantamount to `sinicization,'"and that Taiwan must not "`lock in' our economic lifeline and all our bargaining chips in China."
Chen's hard work has indeed been aimed at creating sustainable economic development for Taiwan. I wonder, however, if he has not mixed up the concept of "market" with the concept of "production" and neglected the complexities of the international division of labor across the Taiwan Strait, something that might cause Taiwan to miss the opportunity to build sustainable development.
Former vice minister of economic affairs Yin Chi-ming (
This statement is an idealistic description of Taiwanese and other foreign businesspeople investing in China. China is playing factory to the world, so of course Taiwanese and other foreign businesspeople want to take advantage of its cheap production resources.
But China is not the whole world market, it is merely a newly developing market with unlimited potential business opportunities where businesses from various countries are engaged in all-out competition. Today, a majority of products manufactured by foreign businesses investing in China are exported to the US, Japan and the EU, and they make up more than 50 percent of all China's exports.
The fact that Taiwanese businesspeople invest in production in China does not mean that China is Taiwan's "only or ... last market." The question of whether Taiwanese businesses see China as their best investment destination involves many factors.
From an economic perspective, Taiwanese businesses are certain to consider the risks, including the political risk, of doing business in China, and they may be clearer than even the Taiwanese government on where the real risks lie. The government's good will should be manifested by offering Taiwanese better information and risk assessments instead of restricting their investments.
Macroeconomically speaking, Taiwan's resources are limited and its domestic market is small. The economy of a growing Taiwan therefore requires the integration of global resources and global market operations. That is why China's cheap production factors and rapidly growing market offer a good opportunity for developing and transforming Taiwan into a platform for Asia-Pacific cooperation that integrates global resources.
"Globalization" and "sinicization" are not diametrically opposed concepts. Sometimes they work to reinforce each other. Just as Chen said in his New Year address, "The complex cross-strait economic and trade policies should not be simplified as a dichotomy of either `opening up' or `tightening up.'"
Seeing the competitive pressures and opportunities offered by globalization and in response to the goal of Taiwan's economic development, a "Greater Taiwan Economic Circle" (GTEC) could be established to function as a blueprint for Taiwan's development and avoid confusion between "globalization" and "sinicization."
The GTEC would turn Taiwan into a platform for the integration of economic resources in the Asia-Pacific region, as well as for products, services and value creation, including production factors such as manpower, capital, information, technology, intermediate goods, spare parts and components.
The GTEC would have four goals: to increase the efficiency with which Taiwan's economic resources are put to use; to expand the nation's economic scope; to improve productivity; and to promote Taiwan's technological and systemic innovation. The ultimate goal of the GTEC would of course be to promote investment in Taiwan by businesses from many countries, including Taiwan, and to improve the nation's economic growth.
To this end, making Taiwan a production base to attract international investment, using Taiwan as a platform for cooperation between industrialists from other countries, making Taiwan's production factors the target of international cooperation and treating Taiwan's products and services as part of international trade, will all serve to expand and deepen the GTEC, and promote prosperity in the investing countries.
The GTEC should of course also include China's production factors, products, services and markets as the motor of Taiwan's economic development to give it an advantage as a platform for Asia-Pacific economic integration. More concretely, Taiwan should become proactive instead of remaining passive. It should actively integrate the benefits of Taiwanese enterprises and foreign businesses and request that China guarantee, and work to improve, the benefits of the GTEC.
This is the opportunity that China offers a Taiwan that is moving toward globalization. Taiwan should grasp this chance instead of stubbornly rejecting it.
Tung Chen-yuan is an assistant professor in the Sun Yat-sen Graduate Institute of Social Sciences and Humanities at National Chengchi University.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under