If a BlackBerry featured in your Christmas wish list, you may be in for a stressful 2006. A staggering three-quarters of us find e-mail addictive and it's jeopardizing our health, according to new research. So serious is the problem for one in five people that they fall into a category of e-mailer called "the dependent''. They check for e-mail compulsively and panic when they cannot get access.
Dependents carry out their first e-mail check as early as 6am and may only say goodnight to their inbox at midnight, found the study by Symantec Corporation.
"E-mail can offer us great benefits and aid our working life, but users need to look at the way they use it and the times they access it,'' says Lindsey Armstrong, senior vice president at Symantec.
"E-mail should never be a hindrance,'' says Armstrong.
This may be wishful thinking, given that 2005 saw an unprecedented increase in the number of messages people have to manage. Nearly every company interviewed for the study said the volume had increased by an average of 47 percent. The result is that over half of individuals now spend more than two hours sending and receiving messages, with one in six spending four hours a day -- the equivalent to more than two working days a week. Many people think nothing of checking their e-mails from outside work, even when they're on holiday or off sick.
`Epidemic'
"There are multiple factors that have helped contribute to the e-mail addiction epidemic we're currently experiencing,'' says Armstrong. "E-mail is now far more than just a communications tool. Individuals use it to manage their diaries and contacts, delegate actions and even treat it as a formal record of events.''
Internal e-mails have become a common feature of today's blame culture: "Didn't you see the e-mail I sent you last week? It was all there,'' is a regular retort among people who seek to cover their backs by copying the world and his wife into every message they send.
"E-mail has become a whole new playground for machiavellian managers to stir up all kinds of trouble,'' says business psychologist Andrew West. "People wind up feeling they have to constantly check their e-mails to save face.''
He says our love/hate relationship with e-mail can make it difficult to switch off.
"There is a comfort factor in getting e-mails, a feeling that people like you enough to send you them. But ones you don't want can fill you with trepidation. It's a very contradictory relationship,'' West says.
E-mail has been found to be a major catalyst for workplace stress. One survey found that our addiction to it is so great that as little as 30 minutes without access causes most users to become irate.
"The fact that the working day is being stretched by the need to manage the growing volume of e-mails and that many people feel they can no longer escape from work even when they get home is also bad for our health,'' says Guy Bunker, chief scientist at Symantec.
Employers lose out, too, he says. "When a new e-mail arrives in your inbox, a typical response is to read it and even reply to it. That breaks our concentration from what we were doing and there is a lot of lost productivity as a result.''
Michael Hulme, director of the Center of Media, Technology and Culture and a professor at Lancaster University in England, adds: "People often respond to e-mails when not in the right frame of mind -- perhaps it's late at night or they're out of the office -- and they make work-based decisions that are hurried or inappropriate.''
In some households, even Christmas dinner is not guaranteed to be an e-mail-free occasion. Another survey by Fujitsu Siemens Computers found nearly half of men and a third of women checked office e-mails over the festive period. Londoners were the most keen to stay in touch with work, while the lowest numbers logging on were in the north-east of England.
`Taking action'
But, says Hulme, a small but growing number of companies are waking up and taking action. One new field is "e-mail analytics.''
Monica Seeley, author of Managing the e-mail Office, explains: "The first step is to audit a person's inbox. It can say a lot about you. For example, someone might insist they empower their team, yet the team is still expected to copy them into every e-mail they send," she says.
"With others, it becomes clear that they hide behind e-mail. They're afraid of communicating face-to-face. Once I know the problems, I can start to offer solutions like stopping endless cc-ing and offering time management tips,'' Seeley says.
Often, the companies Seeley works with -- which range from Levi Strauss to the UK Department of Trade and Industry -- introduce an e-mail charter, a list of value statements on best practice, as an initial step towards implementing a culture change. Technological solutions include diary management packages, spam filters and instant messaging.
But for some companies, an end to inbox addiction is not yet in sight.
British Telecom's attempts to tackle e-mail overload among its 100,000 employees have been unsuccessful to date. Spokesperson Gary Bulland says: "There are an enormous amount of e-mails and not enough time in the day to process them. We consider it a serious issue.''
Congressman Mike Gallagher (R-WI) and Congressman Raja Krishnamoorthi (D-IL) led a bipartisan delegation to Taiwan in late February. During their various meetings with Taiwan’s leaders, this delegation never missed an opportunity to emphasize the strength of their cross-party consensus on issues relating to Taiwan and China. Gallagher and Krishnamoorthi are leaders of the House Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party. Their instruction upon taking the reins of the committee was to preserve China issues as a last bastion of bipartisanship in an otherwise deeply divided Washington. They have largely upheld their pledge. But in doing so, they have performed the
It is well known that Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) ambition is to rejuvenate the Chinese nation by unification of Taiwan, either peacefully or by force. The peaceful option has virtually gone out of the window with the last presidential elections in Taiwan. Taiwanese, especially the youth, are resolved not to be part of China. With time, this resolve has grown politically stronger. It leaves China with reunification by force as the default option. Everyone tells me how and when mighty China would invade and overpower tiny Taiwan. However, I have rarely been told that Taiwan could be defended to
It should have been Maestro’s night. It is hard to envision a film more Oscar-friendly than Bradley Cooper’s exploration of the life and loves of famed conductor and composer Leonard Bernstein. It was a prestige biopic, a longtime route to acting trophies and more (see Darkest Hour, Lincoln, and Milk). The film was a music biopic, a subgenre with an even richer history of award-winning films such as Ray, Walk the Line and Bohemian Rhapsody. What is more, it was the passion project of cowriter, producer, director and actor Bradley Cooper. That is the kind of multitasking -for-his-art overachievement that Oscar
Chinese villages are being built in the disputed zone between Bhutan and China. Last month, Chinese settlers, holding photographs of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), moved into their new homes on land that was not Xi’s to give. These residents are part of the Chinese government’s resettlement program, relocating Tibetan families into the territory China claims. China shares land borders with 15 countries and sea borders with eight, and is involved in many disputes. Land disputes include the ones with Bhutan (Doklam plateau), India (Arunachal Pradesh, Aksai Chin) and Nepal (near Dolakha and Solukhumbu districts). Maritime disputes in the South China