If a BlackBerry featured in your Christmas wish list, you may be in for a stressful 2006. A staggering three-quarters of us find e-mail addictive and it's jeopardizing our health, according to new research. So serious is the problem for one in five people that they fall into a category of e-mailer called "the dependent''. They check for e-mail compulsively and panic when they cannot get access.
Dependents carry out their first e-mail check as early as 6am and may only say goodnight to their inbox at midnight, found the study by Symantec Corporation.
"E-mail can offer us great benefits and aid our working life, but users need to look at the way they use it and the times they access it,'' says Lindsey Armstrong, senior vice president at Symantec.
"E-mail should never be a hindrance,'' says Armstrong.
This may be wishful thinking, given that 2005 saw an unprecedented increase in the number of messages people have to manage. Nearly every company interviewed for the study said the volume had increased by an average of 47 percent. The result is that over half of individuals now spend more than two hours sending and receiving messages, with one in six spending four hours a day -- the equivalent to more than two working days a week. Many people think nothing of checking their e-mails from outside work, even when they're on holiday or off sick.
`Epidemic'
"There are multiple factors that have helped contribute to the e-mail addiction epidemic we're currently experiencing,'' says Armstrong. "E-mail is now far more than just a communications tool. Individuals use it to manage their diaries and contacts, delegate actions and even treat it as a formal record of events.''
Internal e-mails have become a common feature of today's blame culture: "Didn't you see the e-mail I sent you last week? It was all there,'' is a regular retort among people who seek to cover their backs by copying the world and his wife into every message they send.
"E-mail has become a whole new playground for machiavellian managers to stir up all kinds of trouble,'' says business psychologist Andrew West. "People wind up feeling they have to constantly check their e-mails to save face.''
He says our love/hate relationship with e-mail can make it difficult to switch off.
"There is a comfort factor in getting e-mails, a feeling that people like you enough to send you them. But ones you don't want can fill you with trepidation. It's a very contradictory relationship,'' West says.
E-mail has been found to be a major catalyst for workplace stress. One survey found that our addiction to it is so great that as little as 30 minutes without access causes most users to become irate.
"The fact that the working day is being stretched by the need to manage the growing volume of e-mails and that many people feel they can no longer escape from work even when they get home is also bad for our health,'' says Guy Bunker, chief scientist at Symantec.
Employers lose out, too, he says. "When a new e-mail arrives in your inbox, a typical response is to read it and even reply to it. That breaks our concentration from what we were doing and there is a lot of lost productivity as a result.''
Michael Hulme, director of the Center of Media, Technology and Culture and a professor at Lancaster University in England, adds: "People often respond to e-mails when not in the right frame of mind -- perhaps it's late at night or they're out of the office -- and they make work-based decisions that are hurried or inappropriate.''
In some households, even Christmas dinner is not guaranteed to be an e-mail-free occasion. Another survey by Fujitsu Siemens Computers found nearly half of men and a third of women checked office e-mails over the festive period. Londoners were the most keen to stay in touch with work, while the lowest numbers logging on were in the north-east of England.
`Taking action'
But, says Hulme, a small but growing number of companies are waking up and taking action. One new field is "e-mail analytics.''
Monica Seeley, author of Managing the e-mail Office, explains: "The first step is to audit a person's inbox. It can say a lot about you. For example, someone might insist they empower their team, yet the team is still expected to copy them into every e-mail they send," she says.
"With others, it becomes clear that they hide behind e-mail. They're afraid of communicating face-to-face. Once I know the problems, I can start to offer solutions like stopping endless cc-ing and offering time management tips,'' Seeley says.
Often, the companies Seeley works with -- which range from Levi Strauss to the UK Department of Trade and Industry -- introduce an e-mail charter, a list of value statements on best practice, as an initial step towards implementing a culture change. Technological solutions include diary management packages, spam filters and instant messaging.
But for some companies, an end to inbox addiction is not yet in sight.
British Telecom's attempts to tackle e-mail overload among its 100,000 employees have been unsuccessful to date. Spokesperson Gary Bulland says: "There are an enormous amount of e-mails and not enough time in the day to process them. We consider it a serious issue.''
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations