President Chen Shui-bian (
On cross-strait economic exchanges, he changed the principle of "active opening, effective management" to "active management, effective opening."
Whether Chen was playing word games or signaling a substantive shift has become a focus of public debate. Given that Chen has talked much but done little in the past, it is not surprising that people regard this "shift" with some skepticism.
On the day after the speech, Premier Frank Hsieh (
These include visits by Chinese tourists to Taiwan, opening Taiwan to more foreign investment, adopting a clearing mechanism for exchanging the New Taiwan dollar and the yuan, investing in China and other matters. This was the result of the Cabinet learning from experience, when policies were rushed through and with ineffective communication between government bodies. It also indicated a step forward for the government in its collective ability to make policy.
In light of present cross-strait economic exchanges, use of the words "loosen" and "tighten" is surely inadequate. Instead, the government must come up with a more practical plan.
The "active opening, effective management" approach was doomed to fail, because it lacked a serious mechanism to back it up. As a result the "opening" to China took place willy-nilly. That hurt the economy by leading to overdependence, releasing capital flow to China but retaining debt as skilled labor flocked across the Strait. It also failed to protect the safety and interests of Taiwanese businesspeople in China.
China's economic development has entered a high-risk phase. Black holes and real-estate bubbles can happen anytime. State banks are aware of this, and thus their urgency in selling stocks to foreign investors to distribute risk. The Investment Commission under Taiwan's Ministry of Economic Affairs published figures showing that Taiwanese capital in China declined 8.73 percent in November, indicating a cooling of the "China fever."
Also, according to the most recent figures published by China's Ministry of Commerce, every month since last April -- with the exception of September -- foreign capital in China has declined. In each month during the second quarter, the decline reached as much as 10 percent, a level rarely seen in recent years. The statistics serve as a warning, and anyone in Taiwan who blindly advocates investing in China clearly has a secret agenda.
Since China refuses to have any official contact with Taiwan, it is difficult for the government to protect the rights of investors, increasing the risks for government, businesspeople and shareholders. As for China-based Taiwanese companies listing on the stock market here, the lack of government regulation means that this course of action is highly risky and may only be feasible after thorough consideration.
One example of what can go wrong is the Hong Kong investors who were duped by fake shares on the Chinese stock market, despite the close relationship between the territory and the rest of China. Surely Taiwanese policymakers aren't blind to this.
Chen and Hsieh's words are a good start. Taiwan's authorities should follow up with strong measures to "actively manage" China-bound investment.
Paul Lin is a New York-based political commentator.
TRANSLATED BY LIN YA-TI
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations