In November, Beijing unveiled five mascots for the Beijing 2008 Olympic Games. On Dec. 22, China's State Council Information Office published a white paper entitled China's Peaceful Development Road.
The message Beijing intended to convey with the mascots and the white paper was the promotion of a "peaceful rising" and the lack of hegemonic ambitions.
The two developments did not attract much attention in Taiwan, because it was still absorbed by domestic political bickering.
However, we should not underestimate their impact.
With China faring well on the economic front and modernizing its armed forces, other powers have become anxious.
Fueling their concern, the Shanghai Cooperation Organization last year broadened its membership to include Iran, India and Pakistan.
Elsewhere, China and Russia conducted their largest-ever joint military exercise in response to the eastward expansion of NATO and the US-Japan Security Treaty, as well as to counterbalance the wave of revolutions that swept across Eastern Europe last year.
China, Russia and a number of European nations and left-wing regimes in South America are dissatisfied with both the US and Britain and their attempts to promote what is criticized as "liberal imperialism" across the globe.
However, both the US and Japan have accused China of attempting to create an Asian Monroe Doctrine through ASEAN meetings.
Beijing's strategies, propaganda and actions have failed to dispel suspicion in regard to its ambitions, though these have at least delayed any direct confrontation in response.
On the economic front, China has also begun to expand its contributions to the world thanks to a booming economy and increased demand for imports. China is now not only the sixth-largest economy in the world but also the world's third-largest importer.
In the course of 10 years, China's domestic need for information technology, automobiles and telecom products will make it the world's biggest consumer market.
Capitalizing on its economic growth, China has signed procurement contracts with Australia, Canada and South American and African countries for large amounts of raw materials. China adopts a laissez-faire policy toward ASEAN nations by allowing them to enjoy a favorable balance of trade.
China's diplomatic and economic policy has encouraged more entrepreneurs from around the world to pour their capital into Brazil, Russia, India and China itself, a development that has led some academics to wonder if the "Beijing Consensus" will replace the "Washington Consensus." The head of the School of Oriental and African Studies in London has pointed out that China's thirst for raw materials is more beneficial to Africa than all of the efforts made by developed nations to write off that continent's debt.
In recent years, Beijing has realized that the US presence in Northeast Asia and Southeast Asia has discouraged Japan from enhancing its military capability as well as deterring North Korea from making any sudden moves.
Beijing has also sought to diminish the wariness of Southeast Asian nations and prevent nuclear proliferation in order to gain influence in the region.
On top of all of this, to maintain its grip on power, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) must pursue political and economic reforms and stabilize its massive economic growth.
Some American political pundits are beginning to believe that China's rapid development will not necessarily challenge the US' dominant role in world affairs, and that in fact China may be able to assume more responsibility as a member of the international community.
The US continues to call the shots in world affairs while China continues to strengthen its hand. In other words, both liberal imperialism and regional hegemonism are taking what they need.
There are two problems that deserve our attention. First, although the conflict between regional hegemonies is unavoidable, China will be looking to put this scenario off for as long as possible.
Will Taiwan be able to maintain its opposition to Chinese encroachment?
In the face of Beijing's charm offensive, which it has maintained for more than 10 years, how much support will Taiwan be able to sustain with its insistence on a liberal democracy tinged with the influence of the Washington Consensus and claims that it is being oppressed?
Second, other than maintaining latitude in assessing China's economic development, the government should not underestimate China's potential for change.
If China attempts to link its development more closely to the rest of the world and does not seek to become a hegemony, then how will Taipei deal with this?
Chang Teng-chi is a doctoral candidate in political science at the University of Sheffield.
TRANSLATED BY DANIEL CHENG
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations