The article on geothermal heat pumps ("How using geothermal heat is an all-round winner," Jan. 1, p12) totally misses the point. It is not necessary to dig up an acre of land to heat a house with a heat pump. Heat can be extracted from the air.
Heat pumps that use air as their low-temperature source have been around for years. Their efficiency is lower if the outside temperature is below freezing, but in warmer weather, their efficiency is comparable to geothermal heat pumps. Initial cost is slightly higher than that of normal refrigerated air conditioners.
Air conditioners are heat pumps that can only pump heat out. Heat pumps can heat or cool a building. The main reason that a heat pump costs more than an air conditioner is that the outside coil must have a defrost cycle. Also, the compressor runs approximately twice as frequently as an air conditioner's compressor and compressor life is therefore half as long.
Until recently, heat pumps were more expensive than burning natural gas. If power for heat pumps comes from natural gas, then the cost savings are minimal. However, if power comes from coal or nuclear power plants, then heat pumps can be cheaper.
Homes that use electric resistance heating can usually save money by switching to an air-cycle heat pump, even if there is no cooling requirement.
An exception to this is in some parts of Europe, where electricity is much cheaper at night than during the day. In these countries, electricity is used at night to heat bricks. Air is then blown across the bricks during the day, when electricity is expensive.
Are your eyes glazed over yet? None of this is simple. Anyone who tries to make energy policy seem simple by holding up an energy-saving lamp is lying. Correct policy requires understanding how all the alternatives work and what people do under different circumstances.
William Ernest Schenewerk
Los Angeles
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing