As the new year begins, an American looking out at the world from the geographic center of the US just west of Lebanon, Kansas, would see five nations critical to the security of the US -- Canada, Mexico, Japan, Australia, and Britain.
Gone are the Cold War days when the US, no matter who was in power, sought to win over every nation in the rivalry with the Soviet Union.
Today, the US seems to be more selective and to focus on those nations that directly affect its national interests.
To the north, Americans must have friendly neighbors along the 8,000km border with Canada and, to the south, along the 3,200km border with Mexico; both frontiers are largely undefended and could be highways for terrorists.
Yet relations between Washington and Ottawa and Mexico City today are sour, maybe even bitter, by any measure.
To the west, across the Pacific, are Japan and Australia and, to the east, across the Atlantic, is the UK.
The US' alliance with each seems strong but may be rooted more in personal relations between US President George W. Bush and prime ministers Junichiro Koizumi of Japan, John Howard of Australia and Tony Blair of Britain rather than in deep-seated national interests.
Each has generated political opposition at home for being pro-US. Koizumi has said he will step down next fall. Howard has taken much heat from Australians who want assurances they will not be dragged into a war between China and the US.
Blair's popularity has plummeted and his days in office may be numbered.
These island nations are essential to US security as they sit off the Eurasian continent that is home to three quarters of the human race and most of the world's industry and wealth.
Located in Eurasia are the only military powers -- China, Russia and North Korea -- that could threaten the US' global dominacne
The Islamic swath from Morocco to the southern Philippines is the source of most anti-US terrorists.
These three alliances are invaluable in international politics and are indispensable as military bases, whether temporary as in Australia or long-term in Japan and the UK.
The UK especially plays a vital role in the shadowy world of intelligence.
All is not well, however, with the two allies closest to home. Canada, the leading trade partner of the US, has long been ambivalent about the dominating culture of the colossus to the south.
Today, says the Economist magazine, Canadians have become "grumpily anti-American," due largely to a distaste for Bush and the war in Iraq.
A spat between the US ambassador to Ottawa, David Wilkins, and Prime Minister Paul Martin has aggravated the ill feelings. Martin has been critical of US trade and environmental policies while campaigning for in an election scheduled for Jan. 23.
Wilkins responded: "Just think about this," he was quoted in the New York Times, "What if one of your best friends criticized you directly and indirectly almost relentlessly? What if that friend's agenda was to highlight your perceived flaws while avoiding mentioning your successes?"
In Mexico, the second largest trading partner of the US, there has long been resentment of the wealth of Americans. That has been aggravated by recent disputes over trade and especially the issue of Mexican immigrants, legal and illegal, to the US.
After the US House of Representatives approved a bill that calls for a 1,120km fence along the US-Mexico border, many Mexicans called it a "Berlin Wall."
Mexican President Vicente Fox said: "We do not understand this step toward building walls" and "to sending more police and soldiers to the border."
When Bush came into office in January 2001, high on his agenda was fostering new relations with Canada and Mexico. His first foreign trip, in February of that year, was to Mexico.
"I intended it to be that way," he said, and spoke glowingly of a partnership to "improve the lives of citizens in both countries."
Two months later, the president went to Canada to a summit meeting with Canadian and Mexican leaders.
"Together," he said as he departed from the White House, "we will put forward an agenda to strengthen our democracies, to tackle common challenges and we will seek to expand our prosperity by expanding our trade."
Brave words that, like a lot of things, faded into neglect after the terrorist assaults of 9/11, the invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan, and the continuing antagonism between Israel and the Palestinians captured the administration's attention.
Richard Halloran is a writer based in Hawaii.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under