Taiwan not foreigner-friendly
When reading about an English carnival designed to make foreigners "feel at home" in Taiwan ("English carnival celebrates `foreigner-friendly Taiwan,'" Dec. 21, page 2), I felt quite amused.
How can you celebrate a foreigner-friendly environment in a country where taxi drivers cannot even recognize the most famous international hotel's English name? How can foreigners feel at home in a place where it is virtually impossible to have a local wife or girlfriend without the partner being ostracized by large parts of society? Nor is it very foreigner-friendly to teach a useless, local dialect called "Taiwanese" in schools. Not to mention the new pension law, which simply excludes foreigners altogether.
In fact, Taiwan is an almost hopeless provincial nest, and efforts to promote English do not really make much difference.
In Taiwan, especially among pan-green supporters, there is a kind of "Taiwan supremacist" attitude. They look down on Chinese, they despise Vietnamese and Thai nationals, and they also feel deeply suspicious about white foreigners.
Why do so many foreigners live in Singapore and love it over there? Because no girl's parents mind their daughter dating "foreigners" and expat children are taught proper Chinese (Mandarin) and English at public schools -- not to mention the friendliness and high standards of service in Singapore.
The government -- and the Democratic Progressive Party in particular -- should open their hearts and minds to people born outside of Taiwan and be more tolerant to all foreigners -- not only the white, English-speaking ones like me -- rather than holding a ridiculous "English carnival." The pan-green camp should study the Singaporean model rather than promote "Taiwanization" -- a scheme clearly opposed not only to Mainlanders, but also to foreigners.
Of course, foreigners who want to stay in Taiwan should learn Chinese and adapt to Chinese thinking and way of life. However, I am worried that such foreigners are not really attracted to Taiwan by the sometimes bizarre moves to promote the Taiwanese language.
And by the way, most foreigners in Taiwan are not native English speakers.
Richard Zuercher
Taipei
Exposing KMT and PFP lies
Your article ("KMT to scrutinize any new arms plan," Dec. 19, page 3) says that the opposition in the legislature stated that the Patriot missile batteries "stand no chance" of obtaining their approval because they were "vetoed" during the first national referendum held in tandem with last year's presidential election.
It is a bare-faced lie to argue that the arms are not wanted, because the referendum didn't achieve the 50 percent total of voters required to be valid. The question posed in the referendum about "more money for weapons" would have been genuinely vetoed by Taiwanese citizens if the majority had answered "no." However, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the People First Party played dirty by instructing their supporters not to vote in the referendum, rather than voting "no."
In the same manner, they lie when they talk about the 1992 "one China" consensus. What consensus? Saying that there is "one China" while agreeing to disagree on the meaning is plain ridiculous. Even a child can tell us that the product of a positive and a negative is a negative.
Similarly, agreeing to disagree just means disagreeing and the result is no consensus.
How can they try to pass a law based on such a "consensus"? This is just insulting people's intelligence. If the KMT and its allies believe that there is only "one China," then they should tell us what this really means and where Taiwan stands in all this.
Steve Tsou
France
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry