Taitung County Commissioner Wu Chun-li's (吳俊立) suspension from his post immediately after taking office was unprecedented, and we should study the details of the case from a legal perspective.
Wu was charged with corruption while serving as a Taitung County councilor. In 2000, the Taitung District Court sentenced him to 16 years in prison. According to Article 34 of the Public Officials Election and Recall Law (
Therefore, when an official has not yet been convicted of corruption, the presumption of innocence applies, and he or she is still allowed to run in elections.
According to Item 1 of Article 78 of the Law on Local Government Systems (
In other words, the moment Wu was sworn in, the ministry suspended him from his post, exhibiting tremendous administrative efficiency. This has only reminded us of the embarrassing case of the first Hsinchu Mayor Shih Hsing-chung (
According to Item 3 of Article 78 of the Law on Local Government Systems, Item 1 of Article 78 is no longer applicable to those who are suspended from their positions if they take office as a result of winning a by-election. Therefore, if Wu offers to resign from his post and wins a by-election, he will be free to serve in office for his elected term.
Clearly the law is somewhat contradictory. In fact, Item 1 of Article 78 of the law also stipulates that anyone who has violated the Statute for the Punishment of Corruption (
In fact, Wu was charged with corruption while serving as the Taitung County councilor rather than as county commissioner -- the position he can no longer hold. Clearly we must give some consideration to the items relating to the dismissal of officials under the Law on Local Government Systems. In the same way, the Election and Recall Law allows those convicted of corruption to stand for election, but does not allow them to take up the post to which they are elected. This clearly violates the principle of the presumption of innocence. This issue must be given further consideration in the legislature.
Tseng Chao-chang is a former chairman of the National Taiwanese Bar Association.
TRANSLATED BY DANIEL CHENG
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry