Ten years ago, comparing the reform processes in China and Russia was an intellectual fashion. Was it preferable to start with economics -- try and get rich, quick, but don't rock the boat politically -- in the manner of the Chinese? Or was it better to start with politics -- recover liberty and prosperity may follow -- which seemed to be Russia's path under former presidents Mikhail Gorbachev and Boris Yeltsin?
Today, a new comparative debate has started. This time the subject is no longer Russia versus China, because Russia has long ceased to be a point of comparison. Instead, the new comparative debate involves Asia's two new economic, demographic and political giants, China and India. China's annual economic growth has been roughly 8 to 9 percent for the last 26 years; India has recorded similar rates for the last decade.
In the "flat world" of globalization -- to borrow Thomas Friedman's powerful metaphor -- it seems that Russia no longer has a place. Of course, Russia is still the second-largest nuclear power in the world, and, as one of the world's leading exporters of oil and gas, it benefits from today's high energy prices. But Russia's population is disappearing before our eyes. With average male life expectancy just 57 years, the country is losing close to 800,000 people annually. Indeed, Russia is more a fragile oil-producing state than a modernizing economic giant.
To put it bluntly, Russia is no longer in the same category as China. Whereas the "Middle Kingdom" is proudly regaining its former global status after centuries of decline, Russia is defiantly trying to resurrect its former imperial status, but in a manner that appears doomed to fail.
Russia has clearly taken giant steps in the wrong direction, at a time when China has taken steps, however small, in the right direction. When you meet today's "new Russian Nomenklatura," you experience a sudden feeling of being 20 years younger, awash as they are in nostalgia for Cold War posturing.
By contrast, seen from afar, in their new suits, you might think that Chinese economic elites are Japanese. Where Russia represents a return to the past, one sees in China an opening, however ambiguous, to the future.
Of course, some bias is involved here. As a European, I and people like me almost instinctively expect more from Russia. It is, after all, a European nation in cultural, if not political terms, whereas progress in China will not be measured by the introduction of Western-style democracy, but eventually, one hopes, by Singapore-style rule of law.
The diverse paths followed by Russia and China may be explained in part by how the two peoples perceive themselves. The Chinese are comforted in their self-image by the world's combination of admiration for their dynamism, greed for the market they constitute, and apprehension for the competition they represent. Russians, by contrast, seem to be animated by a dark form of narcissism. They do not find anything to be proud of in the eyes of others. They are respected for what they control -- the Soviet legacy of nuclear arms and "Christian energy resources," to quote Russian President Vladimir Putin's bizarre remark on his first official trip to Paris -- but not for their economic performance or their essence.
China and Russia tend to relate to their respective pasts and futures in very different ways -- with self-confidence in China's case, with self-diffidence in the case of Russia. Chinese elites are convinced that time is working in their favor, and that it is only natural that China should regain its rank amongst the world leading powers, perhaps even emerging on top one day.
Indeed, their serene patience stands in stark contrast to the anxious reticence of Russian leaders, who have yet to surmount the humiliation that Russia suffered as a result of the Soviet Union's disintegration at the end of the Cold War. Russia may be experiencing a global "restoration" phase, but in politics and economics, and also with respect to its empire, restoration is headed in the wrong direction.
With Putin's current clampdown on civil society, re-nationalization of key segments of the economy, failure to develop any political approach to resolving the conflict in Chechnya and cultivation of imperial nostalgia, Russia is killing its only chance to matter in the future.
Yet there is no reason for China to declare victory. The gap between the respective qualities of China's economic and scientific elites, on the one hand, and its ruling political elites, on the other, is simply too monumental -- and still growing -- for stability to be taken for granted. One senses in China the birth pangs of civil society, making the introduction of the rule of law increasingly urgent. Without political reforms, China's confidence in herself will quickly turn into disillusion, or even delusion. If that happens, the Russia-China debate might be revived, this time as a comparison of competitive decadence.
Dominique Moisi is a founder of and is now senior advisor at the French Institute for International Relations and is a professor at the Institute of Political Studies in Paris.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and