As the curtain comes down on the latest WTO summit meeting that began last Tuesday in Hong Kong, very little progress has been made. This is not the first time that lack of substantive progress from multilateral negotiations has become a concern for WTO meetings of this sort. The same thing happened during the two prior WTO summits: the 1999 meeting in Seattle and the 2003 meeting in Cancun.
The biggest stumbling blocks continue to be the disparity in wealth between the WTO members and the very contradictory nature of their interests.
Wealthy, developed members such as the US and the EU want developing countries to actively open up and deregulate their telecommunications, financial, insurance and banking sectors, as these are eyed rather greedily by Western multinationals which hope to reap lucrative profits in these developing markets.
One of the most appealing of these is without doubt the Chinese market. Therefore, it came as no surprise when the US released a report on China that accused its government of not fully living up to its obligations as a WTO member and demanded less government interference in key industries. It should also be mentioned that the issue of intellectual property piracy in China remains a major sore point for the US.
By contrast, in order to become a WTO member in the face of staunch Chinese opposition, Taiwan had to enter the organization as a developed economy, thereby exposing itself to the far more stringent requirements this entails, and for which many believe it was not well-prepared. This obviously had some very detrimental effects on the economy. For example, opening up the local market to rice producers from abroad has seriously threatened the livelihood of local rice farmers -- and the government seems ill-prepared to provide aid to this sector.
The developing countries, on the other hand, feel that not enough is being done to narrow the wealth gap between the WTO's members. In particular, the farm subsidies granted (under various disguises) by developed countries to their agricultural sectors have become a major source of disagreement between the two camps. For example, during this past week, the US practice of buying agricultural products from its own farming sector and then donating them to poor countries as food aid came in for much criticism, as it is seen as one way of subsidizing the US agricultural sector. Similarly, the fact that the EU spends around US$110 billion each year on farm subsidies has also invited much criticism from certain WTO members.
In the light of all this discontent, the only real substantive achievement of this round of talks may be the agreement to offer tariff-free and quota-free treatment to farm products from the least-developed members of the WTO.
Many now agree that WTO meetings have become a platform for heated and protracted economic quarrels. Apparently, disagreement was so severe this time around that virtually no progress was made on the intended agenda -- reaching a draft free trade agreement with respect to the farming, service and industrial sectors.
It is indeed saddening to see the WTO summit meeting being remembered largely for the bickering that went on inside the meeting hall, and the demonstrations and protests that took place outside.
The WTO was founded on ideals. While the process of trade liberalization instigated by the organization has caused its fair share of grief, the ideals on which it is founded should not be lost altogether.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.