Some of my friends are overseas Taiwanese living in Taipei with their families. All of them have dual nationality, holding Taiwanese and US passports. It strikes me that their children cannot find their own identity. They look like Taiwanese children, but they don't speak their native language. They go to school, but it's not the local Taiwanese school.
Since they don't share the language and the traditional culture of Taiwanese people, they live in a strange ghetto and they don't see the real Taiwan. Consequently, the way those children perceive themselves and the way other people perceive them bring up many contradictions that will have a very negative impact on the children. It is like they are putting on other people's ill-fitting clothes.
I don't know how those kids will manage to find a well-balanced direction in life.
Instead of sending their children to regular Taiwanese schools, some local families enroll them in foreigners' schools such as the Taipei American School.
How can those children find their own identity and roots? Why don't they follow the normal local educational program? The children didn't ask for it, it was their parents' choice based on the fact that globalization means American culture. But this conception of globalization seems too restrictive, because you can't reduce the world to the US.
Do we have to abandon, in the name of globalization, entire sectors of life to an English-German, English-Taiwanese, English-French or English-Chinese pidgin, or even English itself? The surreptitious or overt "enforcement" of the "one market, one language" principle or the equation "American English equals progress" is unacceptable, for many reasons.
First, other native languages will lose their cultural and social status. If we lose our native language, we lose our identity, because the native language is the one in which you best express your feelings, your emotions, your empathy.
Second, this will create new communication barriers between the rich and the poor, with a kind of Latin for global, abstract, important matters spoken by the privileged few and a vernacular for daily life spoken by the proletariat. In every country there are fully developed languages, and we don't want them to evolve back into dialects.
Third, if important events like political issues are dealt with in a foreign language, the values and identities linked to this foreign language will influence ways of thinking and acting, so politicians will prevail internationally over national interests.
Finally, the world will become monolithic, intolerant and dictatorial. This will send us back to the time of those awful uniform colonizations.
To put it plainly, some linguae francae, like Chinese, Spanish, French and English, are certainly useful tools, because in some countries there are so many dialects that it's more convenient to use one language to do business, but the linguae francae must not be allowed to depreciate all the other languages, especially in their own territory.
If we want a real democratic globalization, we have to defend our own languages. Globalization must not be the subduing of all others by the most powerful, it must be based on equal and democratic participation.
In Taiwan, children can practice local dialects in primary school. Mandarin is the national language, while English is the first foreign language and Spanish, German, Japanese or French are the second foreign languages, which they can study in senior high school. So I suggest that dual-nationality parents should let their children go to local schools, where they can learn about their country's history and culture in their native language.
If parents fail in their mission to transmit their cultural heritage to their children, the children will end up denying their Taiwanese heritage. They may not even know anything about the 228 Incident or the traditional religious parade days either.
Sylvie Allassonniere
Tamsui
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) trip to China provides a pertinent reminder of why Taiwanese protested so vociferously against attempts to force through the cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014 and why, since Ma’s presidential election win in 2012, they have not voted in another Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate. While the nation narrowly avoided tragedy — the treaty would have put Taiwan on the path toward the demobilization of its democracy, which Courtney Donovan Smith wrote about in the Taipei Times in “With the Sunflower movement Taiwan dodged a bullet” — Ma’s political swansong in China, which included fawning dithyrambs