Political parties tend to sensationalize election campaigns by exposing corruption among their opponents rather than focusing on policy. The problem with this is that all sense of proportion is lost; now, the pan-blue camp has lost all sense of reason in its latest exercise in spleen-venting.
The pan-blue camp's latest move has been to use its legislative majority to slash the budgets of the Mainland Affairs Council, the Government Information Office, the Central Election Commission and the Examination Yuan. If such election stunts continue, various key government departments will be paralyzed after the Dec. 3 elections, just like the Control Yuan, where only drivers and cleaners now turn up for work.
The mudslinging this year began with the pan-blue camp jumping on the Kaohsiung Rapid Transit Corp scandal. This led to revelations that former Presidential Office deputy secretary-general Chen Che-nan (
This gave the pan-blue camp's morale a huge boost. In response, the pan-green camp attacked the 18 percent preferential interest rate given to retired military personnel, civil servants and schoolteachers. It also accused several high-ranking Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) officials of including the years they served as party officials to increase their pension entitlements.
In a healthy democracy, the opposition monitors the public purse and government spending. It should not slash government budgets simply to punish what it sees as "disobedient" government agencies. Although pan-blue camp legislators take pleasure in such retaliatory measures, they undermine the country as a whole.
Although this has also damaged the Democratic Progressive Party's (DPP) administrative record, the ill-effects of these actions can only hurt the broad majority of Taiwanese. Those who suffer as a result will grow impatient with the punitive measures the opposition has adopted.
Unless legislators can convince the public that its budget cuts are appropriate, their actions will be seen as emotive rather than rational. Forcing ministerial resignations and slashing budgets as forms of punishment will only foster a culture of yes-men in government agencies, while anyone willing to defend government policy will be forced out. It will be a case of bad money driving good money out of circulation.
Is the ultimate goal of the opposition to fill government with servile administrators whose aim is to preserve harmony at all costs, even at the price of good government? It is tempting to say that this attitude may alienate moderate pan-blue supporters.
Another consequence of these spoiling tactics might be added pressure on ministries in relation to the little money that they can secure. This would merely exacerbate a situation that flourished under the KMT, when the party did deals with legislators acting in cahoots with local contractors in return for support for certain policies.
Taiwan, like any other democratic country, simply cannot afford to pay the price of ruling and opposition parties paralyzing the government in an electoral feud. If the legislature cuts the government's budget by as much as NT$25 billion (US$744 million) as it has threatened, then this would be the largest cut ever inflicted on the DPP government.
Pan-blue camp legislators may yet discover that petulant legislative vandalism can have grave electoral repercussions.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.