During a recent trip to Taiwan, I found that many pan-green supporters are exasperated by President Chen Shui-bian's (³¯¤ô«ó) pledge not to write a new constitution and change the national title during his term in office.
As a result, they may choose not to cast their ballots in the upcoming local government elections, to punish the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) and force it to push ahead with reform.
That these pan-green supporters have such a love-hate attitude toward the DPP is understandable. It is also perfectly justifiable for them to criticize the governing party and Chen.
However, refusing to vote in the elections will only prove counter-productive, and bring about serious consequences.
First, if the pan-blues secure a landslide victory in the upcoming elections, they will become more hawkish. The pan-blues believe that they emerged a big winner in the previous legislative elections simply because they were not the big losers.
Since then, the nation's political climate has become even more complicated, with former Chinese Nationalist Party chairman Lien Chan (
Therefore, if the pan-blues do well in the elections, they will begin to believe that the nation has wearied of localization, which will boost their momentum.
Early next year, pan-blue legislators will force the passage of their cross-strait peace advancement bill.
This bill is tantamount to legitimizing Beijing's "one China" policy.
Once the whole world believes that "one China" refers to the one ruled by the People's Republic of China, then the Republic of China will have been sold out and Taiwan will disintegrate as a separate entity.
Second, if the pan-blues win the upcoming elections, the Chinese leadership will become as cocky as the pan-blues. Beijing will believe that its strategy of isolating Taiwan diplomatically is still feasible, and that allying with the pan-blue camp to attack the island's localization forces has been successful.
As a result, it will strengthen its "united front" strategy against Taiwan.
Third, if the pan-blues vanquish the pan-greens in the upcoming elections, the US' attitude toward Taiwan is going to change. Over the past few years, many in the US have called on Washington to re-assess its China policy. If the green camp loses this time, the US is going to take another look at the political climate in Taiwan, especially the strength of the pan-green forces. This will certainly affect the US' perception of Taiwan's efforts toward localization.
Sino-US relations have been at a low recently, with Chinese President Hu Jintao (JÀAÀÜ) getting the cold shoulder when he visited the US in September. This week, US President George W. Bush has traveled to Beijing. However, his visit to China comes after stops in South Korea and Japan.
Interestingly, the US government pointed out that Bush's trip to China is a working visit rather than a state visit, indicating that bilateral relations between these two superpowers are lukewarm at present.
Not long ago, the US agreed that former President Lee Teng-hui (
This implied an effort by the US to counterbalance China's aggression and "united front" strategy against Taiwan. However, if the pan-blues win a landslide victory next month, then this policy will come to a halt.
Fourth, if the pan-green camp loses next month, it will be seen as being on a losing streak. If this happens, the green camp will become so dejected that it may even lose the next legislative and presidential elections.
Some believe that pan-green supporters can be galvanized into action only when the DPP suffers a major electoral defeat. However, the pan-greens were grouchy and low in spirits after the results of the last legislative elections were released, and not much changed.
The DPP not only failed to seek to reform itself after the loss, it arranged a tete-a-tete between Chen and Soong. Lien's and Soong's brazen visits to China are directly related to the governing party's wishy-washy attitude.
Will pan-green supporters be able to turn the tables if they choose not to cast their ballots this time? I believe it will only make the situation worse.
Although the DPP has been in power for five years, it does not have much experience managing a nation.
By contrast, the KMT was in power for more than 50 years and had a monopoly on all the talent and resources.
But despite all of its failings, the DPP will never sell out Taiwan to China.
When Lien was traveling in China, he even said the KMT would ally itself with the CCP and make use of the cross-strait peace advancement bill to "promote" cross-strait exchanges.
At this crucial moment for Taiwan, I hope the Taiwanese can come to their senses and make a wise decision.
Cao Changching is a writer based in the US.
Translated by Daniel Cheng
French firm DCI-DESCO in April won a bid to upgrade Taiwan’s Lafayette frigates, which has strained ties between China and France. In 1991, France sold Taiwan six Lafayette frigates and in 1992 sold it 60 Mirage 2000 fighter jets. To prevent arms sales between the nations, China negotiated an agreement with France and in 1994 in a joint statement, France promised that there would be no future arms sales to Taiwan. From China’s point of view, the DCI-DESCO deal constitutes a breach of the agreement, but the French stance is that it is not selling Taiwan new weapons, but instead providing a
Chung Yuan ChristiaN University is clearly in bed with the People’s Republic of China. This can be the only explanation why the school’s authorities have done their utmost to shield a student, who lodged a complaint against an associate professor, and then used thuggish tactics to compel the teacher to issue two separate apologies to China. The original complaint, filed by an unnamed Chinese student, was for remarks by associate professor Chao Ming-wei (招名威) during a class on the origin of COVID-19. A second complaint was filed by the same student after Chao, during an apology, stated that he was a
President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) in her inaugural address on May 20 firmly said: “We will not accept the Beijing authorities’ use of ‘one country, two systems’ to downgrade Taiwan and undermine the cross-strait status quo.” The Chinese government was not too happy, and later that day, an opinion piece on the Web site of China’s state broadcaster China Central Television said: “While Tsai’s first inaugural address four years ago was read by Beijing as an ‘unfinished answer sheet,’ the one she presented this time was even more below-par.” Speaking to the China Review News Agency, Shanghai Institutes for International Studies vice president
During my twenty-two years in the US Senate, I became a student of Taiwan and its history. I was chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Subcommittee on East Asia, the Pacific and International Cybersecurity Policy, and have made at least 25 trips to Taiwan and have been invited as an observer to two of the nation’s presidential elections. Taiwan’s continuous economic miracle has seen the nation transition from a mixed agricultural-industrial society at the end of Japan’s 50 years of jurisdiction to today’s economic powerhouse, unmatched by most nations of the world. Just as outstanding has been Taiwan’s decades of resistance and