On Nov. 16, pan-blue camp legislators cut over NT$500 million (US$14.87 million) from the Mainland Affairs Council's (MAC) budget for next year, leaving only NT$268 million for personnel costs.
They also set five conditions for reinstating the budget: the implementation of direct cross-strait transport links; removing all restrictions on the small three links; making it easier for Chinese tourists to visit Taiwan; charter flight services over the Lunar New Year holiday; and direct flight services between Hong Kong and Macau, and Taipei's Sungshan Airport, Kaohsiung's Hsiaokang International Airport and Taichung's Chingchuankang Airport.
MAC Chairman Joseph Wu (
The blue camp has cut the council's budget in an act of vengeance because the government has taken a strict approach to Chen's application to participate in a KMT-Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Forum next month.
The government has demanded that China agree to negotiate the application with Taiwan.
When the pan-blue camp was first threatening to slash the MAC's budget, it faced criticism from the public, with many people wondering which country's legislature the pan-blue legislators belonged to and why they were using Taiwanese taxpayers' money to do work for China.
When the pan-blues unexpectedly disregarded this criticism and went ahead and with wanton deep cuts to the MAC's budget, they showed they had lost all judgement.
The action revealed two frightening attitudes. First, the blue camp's budget review was devoid of professional standards.
They disregarded the well-being of the public and national development needs, they abandoned the principle of social justice and they let political beliefs and ideology decide the budget's fate.
In the current atmosphere of a mutual lack of trust and a stand-off between the government and opposition, government budgets have often encountered unreasonable problems and obstruction.
In cutting the council's budget, pan-blue camp legislators have simply found another way to vent their anger over a strict review of broadcasting license extensions by the Government Information Office (GIO) that raised suspicions that TVBS was funded by Hong Kong and Macau investors.
In addition, the pan-blue camp's refusal to review the eight-year, NT$80 billion flood control and the arms procurement bills shows that they only care about their own partisan interests, and ignore the public's interests.
Second, the pan-blues are also opposing the MAC for the sake of opposition. It seems that these pan-blue legislators are only willing to submit themselves to Beijing, and only consider the benefits for China's leadership when reviewing the MAC's budget.
In the past, the pan-blue camp did not dare to openly collude with Beijing, although it never denied possessing a "greater China complex."
However, since being defeated in last year's presidential elections, the pan-blues have ceased to conceal their pro-China stance.
Furthermore, pan-blue political has-beens such as former KMT chairman Lien Chan (連戰) and People First Party Chairman James Soong (宋楚瑜) have found great solace in Beijing's use of its "united front" strategy after their first-ever visits to China this spring. Other pan-blue politicians have followed suit, jumping on the "China fever" bandwagon.
Since the visits, the pan-blue camp has stopped covering up its pro-Beijing nature and has strengthened its efforts to obstruct the arms procurement bill without considering the welfare of the Taiwanese.
Now, they have gone overboard by slashing the MAC's entire budget and offering the five conditions for reversing its decision as a way to win Beijing's praise.
This week, while traveling to Kyoto, Japan, US President George W. Bush lauded Taiwan's democracy, freedom and prosperity, and urged China to emulate its achievements.
Therefore, we believe Taiwan's most precious assets are its Taiwanese awareness and democratic and economic achievements. Nonetheless, it is tragic to see all of this constantly disparaged by the pan-blues and the nation's pro-China media.
The pan-blue camp has spoken for China and extolled the CCP, and promoted China's "united front" strategy against the Taiwanese. It is also abusing its legislative majority and serving as Beijing's pawn, pressuring the government to open up to China with threats to slash the budgets of all government agencies.
The pan-blues' decision to slash the MAC's budget and its failure to pass the arms procurement bill can not be regarded as a simple check and balance under a democratic system.
Rather, it is a warning for all Taiwanese to be alert to the pan-blues' drift toward China.
Translated by Perry Svensson and Daniel Cheng
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Ursula K. le Guin in The Ones Who Walked Away from Omelas proposed a thought experiment of a utopian city whose existence depended on one child held captive in a dungeon. When taken to extremes, Le Guin suggests, utilitarian logic violates some of our deepest moral intuitions. Even the greatest social goods — peace, harmony and prosperity — are not worth the sacrifice of an innocent person. Former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), since leaving office, has lived an odyssey that has brought him to lows like Le Guin’s dungeon. From late 2008 to 2015 he was imprisoned, much of this