Recently there has been much concern among native English-speaking teachers regarding some recent alleged deportations of English Second-Language (ESL) teachers for not being "legal" for whatever reason. Perhaps they had been misinformed as to their legal status as teachers, and perhaps they knew exactly what they were doing. We, as their colleagues, may never really know the truth.
But as A. Arnold points out (Letters, Nov. 17, page 8), work permits and Alien Resident Certificates (ARCs) are two different things. Even though I have been working in Taiwan as an ESL teacher for two years, I'm still not fully informed on the finer details of the laws governing the working status of foreigners in Taiwan. Quite simply, I rely on my school to be honest and law-abiding in their dealings with me. I don't think any Taiwanese school owner could fully explain the intricate and sometimes baffling rules that apply to ESL teachers and their legal status.
I know I'm not alone in this situation. I've talked to some Canadian and US school managers and owners who cannot explain all of the conditions, pre-requisites, exceptions and whatever else should be known when teaching ESL here in Taiwan. So perhaps it's time that an information letter is produced for the ESL industry that outlines exactly what the process is, and what is acceptable and not acceptable. This should be handed out with every ARC.
As I have learned in my short time here, there seems to be many "gray areas" that are accepted as common practice in some schools and seen as unacceptable in other schools.
There is a very popular Taiwan message board used by numerous ESL teachers here and abroad on which the recent deportation of several ESL teachers has been debated at great length, and rightly so. Some of the teachers were apparently deported because they were informed by their schools that they were legal when in fact they were not. So now these people must face the shame of their family and fellow countrymen for breaking a law that may not have been clearly defined for them.
I'm guessing that few foreigners welcome being deported for any reason. Even an interrogation by the local police can be quite overwhelming, given the fact that most of us are under the impression that we are legally working in Taiwan. Most often it is an error by the teacher, the school or the authorities that has caused a great deal of embarrassment for an individual.
So to this end, a fact sheet should be drafted by the proper Taiwanese authorities so that the nation as a whole does not gain a dubious reputation in the industry of ESL instruction. Good news travels fast, bad news travels faster.
Admittedly, we English teachers have it pretty good in Taiwan compared with some other foreign workers, and I am enjoying myself despite the language barrier. However, if we are running the risk of deportation simply by doing our job, then it would be nice to know.
Paul Andrew
Tainan City
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations