Most people in Taiwan are familiar with the phrase, "that which can be named is not the constant way," which is the opening line of Lao Tzu's (老子) Taoist classic the Tao Te Ching (道德經). By this, Lao Tzu meant that any definition of the truth cannot encompass the absolute truth. One cannot express in words the true nature of things nor the principles of natural phenomena. Although these words were first articulated over two millennia ago, they are still supported by the social sciences and linguistics. Sociologists commonly accept that the truths held by a society are structurally related to the language that society uses, and that this truth is relative.
For example, the vast majority of US citizens know only of the Middle East through books and newspapers, and this has shaped their understanding of it. What's more, the language in which this information is transmitted is deeply rooted in a certain literary tradition. From Greek mythology through Dante's Divine Comedy to the works of modern European scholars, the Arab world has been portrayed as populated by greasy, lazy, dishonest, conniving and cruel individuals (see Edward Said's Orientalism).
Throughout history, this perceived truth has been taken by the majority of people in the West to be the incontrovertible truth. After Sept. 11, many politicians acted with this ingrained perception of the Middle East in mind, leading to the Iraq war and the violent death of tens of thousands of people. The whole situation is promising to become a self-fulfilling prophecy.
After Marco Polo's perception of China was accepted as truth by the West, 19th century China found itself carved up by the Western powers. The damage done then still resonates today.
We can see the disasters that can occur when people assume that their perception of the facts represents the truth. Lao Tzu's great contribution was in seeing the huge discrepancy between relative and absolute truth. It's a pity that over the years people have failed to see this as clearly as he did.
This lesson has also not been learned by certain sections of Taiwan's media. There are people in high places lining their own pockets as they pretend to work for the good of the people. There are high-profile characters who would rather spout rumor than bother verifying the facts. And there are legislators who talk rubbish on a daily basis.
The strange thing is that this kind of behavior is encouraged in the media. If things carry on like this, who knows what is going to happen to our peaceful society. Can people really have forgotten the so-called "Network 228 Incident," in which a female student from Tunghai University was put through the mill on account of groundless rumors, and that TVBS anchorwoman Pan Yen-fei (潘彥妃) was practically driven from the country by members of her own profession? The perceived facts behind these incidents were not as they seemed, but they still caused some people a lot of pain.
Taiwanese people are the inheritors of China's 5000 years of culture, but everything they see around them undermines this glorious inheritance. One would be hard-pressed to find people in the media who didn't expect us to believe that what they say is good is wonderful, and what they say is bad is the devil incarnate. For Lao Tzu, good and bad did not constitute polar opposites, they were two sides of the same coin. We need to be careful when it comes to appearances, we need to consider the power of language and try to avoid the disasters that can occur when people are misled into taking the perceived as the gospel truth. If people could only take more notice of the opening line of Lao Tzu's Tao Te Ching, Taiwan might become a more harmonious place.
F.Y. Kuo is professor of Information Systems at National Sun Yat-sen University.
TRANSLATED BY PAUL COOPER
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.