In a bid to revitalize the nation's sluggish economy, President Chen Shui-bian (
Taiwan last held such a conference in August 2001. It gathered together some 300 business leaders, academics and politicians who reached consensus on 322 issues -- including halving the capital-gains tax on real-estate profits and opening up the nation's stock market more to foreign investment. According to the latest government documents, an impressive 90 percent of those recommendations have been implemented.
This second conference comes at a time when the nation's export dominance in the world market has fallen, the local bourse has been the worst-performing stock market in Asia and both domestic investment and consumption have stagnated.
The government plans to hold the conference after the Dec. 3 local government elections, hoping that the recent political turmoil will by then have settled down. Unfortunately, the political deadlock is likely to continue after those elections. Seeing no political reward in cooperation, opposition parties will almost certainly boycott any economic initiatives brought by the ruling DPP through at least the 2008 presidential election.
Some have argued that Taiwan's economic problems persist because the government has failed to implement the remaining 10 percent of the last conference's recommendations, most of which dealt with cross-strait policy. But others say that the last conference's flawed policies, such as allowing more capital outflow to China, are precisely the cause of the nation's economic quagmire. Given such contradictory conclusions, reaching a political consensus on where to go from here looks like an impossible task.
The government's goal is laudable: It wants to use a national conference to solicit the collective public will and attempt to untangle political and economic issues. But given the nation's deep political polarization, trying to untie such knots is unrealistic. Moreover, there is already much that the government can do to improve the nation's investment and industrial environment, without the need for another conference.
Holding a conference will not be effective if the government only cares about the formalities and appearance of economic consensus, rather than tackling the thorny political issues that lie beneath. And when it comes to finding agreement on cross-strait policy, the government isn't likely to make much progress.
But what it can do is accelerate plans for free-trade agreements with major trading partners such as the US, Japan and ASEAN nations. Such agreements would reduce our economic dependency on China and prevent Taiwan from being marginalized.
The plan to hold a second national economic conference may be a genuine effort to boost the economy. But if politics prevails over economics -- as is likely -- the only thing the meeting is likely to produce is a lot of hot air.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry