In an article about a referendum coming to a vote in Maine this week, the Associated Press reports that opponents of broadened civil rights protections for homosexual men and women claim that such legislation, already signed into law by the governor, would "grant a new status to gay men and lesbians that could open the door to same-sex marriage."
Meanwhile, Marc Lacey of the New York Times reports from Nairobi, Kenya, that in a referendum revamping that nation's constitution, "there has been disagreement on whether the language opposing discrimination would protect gay men and lesbians, who are scorned here."
Apparently, in writing about people who are homosexual, the word gay no longer covers both men and women. (Contrariwise, the word guy, as I noted in a recent column, now does apply to both sexes when taken together, though seldom to women individually.)
Most stylebooks are a half-step behind current usage. Gay, alone, is "acceptable as popular synonym for both male and female homosexuals (noun and adjective)," advises the Associated Press, "although it is generally associated with males, while lesbian is the more common term for female homosexuals."
The Times says "Gay[s] may refer to homosexual men or more generally to homosexual men and women. In specific references to women, lesbian is preferred. When the distinction is useful, write gay men and lesbians."
It seems to me that the usage is now the specifically inclusive gay men and lesbians whether the distinction is useful or not.
Why is gay no longer encompassing enough? "Historically, gay represented both homosexual men and women and technically still does," says Chris Crain, editor of the gay weeklies the Washington Blade and the New York Blade, "but a number of gay women felt that gay was too male-associated and pressed to have lesbians separately identified so they weren't lost in the gay-male image."
That led to such names as the Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation. (The Washington Blade began in 1969 as the Gay Blade, a play on an old expression about a gallant.)
Diane Anderson-Minshall, executive editor of Curve, a lesbian magazine in San Francisco, agrees that the one-word adjective was expanded to set homosexual women apart.
"When, in the queer world, you say `the gay community,' the majority of the time that conjures up San Francisco's largely male Castro District, or West Hollywood or Queer Eye for the Straight Guy, so interjecting the word lesbian into the mix is a necessary reminder that we -- gay women -- are not simply a subset of that larger male world but rather our own distinct community of individuals," she said.
The editor freely uses "queer," formerly a slur, to include not only lesbians but "bisexual women and lesbian-identified transgender women." This leads to the initialese LGBT, standing for "Lesbian Gay Bisexual Transgender," as well as its gay-first GLBT.
The reader will note my careful use of the word homosexual as an adjective modifying a noun like man rather than as a noun itself. That's for two reasons: first, because the prefix homo is from the Greek homos, "the same," in this case denoting a "same sex" relationship, not to be confused with the Latin homo, "man," as in homo sapiens, the current species of human being.
Another reason for the wincing at homosexual, especially as a noun, is the emphasis that the word places on sexuality, while gay and lesbian also may range across cultural and social attitudes (but watch out for that no-no lifestyle).
An American Psychological Association report notes that homosexual "has been associated in the past with deviance, mental illness and criminal behavior," which has led to a "negative stereotype." As that connotation wears off, I expect that the noun -- a standard English synonym for the now widely used "same-sex" -- will make a comeback.
We know where lesbian (no longer capitalized) comes from: the Greek island Lesbos, "after the alleged practice of Sappho" as the Oxford English Dictionary carefully puts it, home of the poet (formerly poetess) who made the place famous. The word gay, which originally meant "lighthearted" as in "her heart was young and gay," was British slang for "a loose woman" in 1825, turning into "a homosexual boy" in 1935 and gaining that meaning in US slang in the 1950s. (Forget the meaning of "cheerful;" the call letters of a Washington radio station, WGAY, are long gone.)
First use I can find of the compound adjective same-sex is a headline in the May 29, 1970, Valley News. of Van Nuys, California, "Rise of Same-Sex Marriage Stirs Legislation Move." That headline fits today over articles from Maine to Kenya.
RETRACTION, DOC
In a recent column about the latest baseballingo, I took a "fanciful leap" about the origin of the Bugs Bunny change-up pitch, speculating that the deceptive slow ball had its origin in a fable by Aesop. A few readers (actually, several hundred) set me straight.
Typical was this from Michael Greicius, a neuroscientist at Stanford, and his son Quinn: "A much less fanciful provenance of this term links it to a 1946 Looney Tunes short called Baseball Bugs, in which Bugs, playing all nine positions, single-handedly defeats the Gas-House Gorillas. Facing oversize, unshaven batters, Bugs delivers a change-up so devastatingly slow that he is able to strike out the side with one pitch."
While at bat, I recalled how Brooklyn Dodger fans called the "fall classic" the "World Serious." Whiffed again; Ring Lardner fans call attention to that locution in his 1914 collection of stories, You Know Me, Al.
Fortunately, I asked for readers' help on the origin of go yard, meaning "to hit a home run." Some fans were sure it started at Oriole Park in Camden Yards in Baltimore; other Googlers found 466 usages of "hit the ball out of the yard," while the Factiva database turned up a 1988 Chicago Tribune citation: "A batter with power can hit a ball out of the ball yard ... he can go back, go massive or go yard."
Swing and learn.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry