The agreement to open up the Kashmiri border is a step in the right direction for India-Pakistan relations that will benefit earthquake survivors, even if it has come a bit late, analysts said.
"It is a positive development, it will help people affected by the earthquake on both sides," political analyst Hasan Askari said. "It will also improve the goodwill between the two countries and Kashmiris on both sides."
India and Pakistan agreed late on Saturday to an unprecedented opening of the heavily militarized border in divided Kashmir from Nov. 7 to help victims of the earthquake that struck there earlier this month.
"It's an incremental move forward, but in real terms it is more symbolic," said Talat Masood, a retired Pakistani general and analyst.
The agreement came a week after Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf proposed opening the Line of Control (LoC) to allow the two-way movement of Kashmiris, in a bid to help millions left homeless by the Oct. 8 disaster.
"There are still certain things which need to be improved in the ways people would like. Kashmiris have been allowed to cross the LoC on foot, which means their capacity to carry relief goods would be limited," Masood said.
More than 54,000 have been confirmed dead in Pakistan, mainly in Pakistan-administered Kashmir, and around 1,300 others have died in the Indian-controlled part of the Himalayan region since the 7.6 magnitude quake.
Masood complained that the move to open the LoC a full month after the worst natural disaster in Pakistan's history was belated, but Askari disagreed, saying such a delay was to be expected.
"The idea came after the earthquake and governments take time to make up their minds. Besides, there are certain [security] concerns on both sides about opening the border," he said.
Kashmiris living in villages on the Pakistani side of the LoC expressed apprehension on Sunday about the complex procedures to get permits to cross the border.
Ghulam Ahmed Bhat, who migrated in 1990 to Pakistani Kashmir from the frontier town of Kupwara on the Indian side, said people should be able to move about freely.
"The decision is good but if difficult procedures are put in place, it would be meaningless and just a cosmetic step," the 37-year-old said.
He said he had tried and failed several times to get a permit to use the landmark trans-Kashmir bus service launched in April this year.
A joint statement issued by the nuclear-armed rivals in Islamabad on Sunday said that Kashmiris would be required to fulfill the same formalities for the new agreement as they do for the bus service.
"It should not be like the way people had it for bus service travel, for which they had to undergo a cumbersome procedure and scrutiny by about a dozen intelligence agencies," Bhat said.
Both sides agreed crossing points would be opened at Nauseri-Tithwal, Chakhti-Uri, Hajipur-Uri, Rawalakot-Poonch and Tattapani-Mendhar for an indefinite period from Nov. 7.
The agreement is unprecedented and the opening is sensitive for India as it accuses Pakistan-based militant groups of fanning an insurgency in its part of Kashmir since 1989.
The deal was announced hours after three blasts rocked the Indian capital New Delhi on Saturday, killing at least 62 people. A little known pro-Pakistan Islamic militant group, Inquilab, later claimed responsibility for the bombings.
Pakistan "strongly condemned" the New Delhi attacks as a "criminal act of terrorism."
Noted Pakistani writer and peace activist Munir Ahmed, known as Munno Bhai, said the Kashmir agreement meant things were slowly improving between the neighbors, who have fought two of their three wars over the territory.
"It is a good development," he said.
Asked why both countries took a long time to reach an agreement, he simply replied, "It takes some time before snow melts and it should melt slowly."
The momentum for peace between the nuclear-armed rivals appeared to have been on the rise since the earthquake more than three weeks ago.
Pakistan has welcomed assistance provided by India for the earthquake victims. New Delhi has pledged US$25 million in response to a UN appeal for funds.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.