Syrian President Bashar Assad is in a box from which he cannot escape, Western diplomats say, after UN investigators implicated senior regime figures in February's murder of Lebanese prime minister, Rafik Hariri. But while Syria's president is no Houdini, rumors of his imminent demise appear exaggerated.
One reason is international divisions about what to do. The US and Britain want UN action, leading to possible sanctions.
But French Foreign Minister Philippe Douste-Blazy said on Monday that any decision-making should be left until the UN's inquiry was complete.
Damascus has credible grounds for hoping that Russia and China will oppose Western-initiated punitive action through the UN, as has been the case with other "states of concern" such as Sudan, Myanmar and Zimbabwe.
And Washington may yet be distracted by a bigger target. US National Security Adviser Stephen Hadley was in Moscow on Sunday seeking Russian support for UN action against Iran. The Syrian dossier barely got a mention.
"I expect the UN Security Council will only issue a warning this week," said Rime Allaf, a Syria expert at the think tank Chatham House. "But if the UN inquiry's final report on Dec. 15 says regime figures should be handed over, Assad will be in a very difficult position."
Syria's leader has other options. He would play for time and to the Arab gallery, Allaf suggested, presenting his country to the Muslim world as the latest victim of a familiar US antipathy.
That is already happening. Syria rejected the UN report as being politically motivated; at the same time, the foreign ministry dangled the possibility of increased cooperation.
And the war for Arab ears has already begun. Mass pro-government demonstrations in Damascus and Aleppo on Monday illustrated the leadership's determination to mobilize regional opinion in support of what is being portrayed as a confrontation with the US as much as the UN. "Wake up Arabs, your turn will come soon!" said one banner.
The officially organized protests were a reminder that despite public dissatisfaction over living standards, 20 percent unemployment and falling oil income, the regime still knows how to exploit nationalist sentiment -- and faces little political opposition.
Assad's second line of defense follows the Gaullist model: Apres moi, le deluge. This posits that there is no obvious or acceptable successor to the ruling Baathists that he and his late father, Hafez Assad, have succeeded in holding together in an ethnically and confessionally disparate country, and that civil war merging with Iraq's could ensue if the regime fell.
Malik al-Abdeh, spokesman for the exiled Movement for Justice and Development opposition party, said such dire eventualities could not be ignored.
"The Sunni Salafist movement with its jihadist offshoots is a growing force within Syria, especially among the rural young," he said. "It is not under the influence of traditional Islamist parties like the Muslim Brotherhood. It is a relatively new phenomenon, greatly boosted by the Iraq insurgency ... it represents the strongest challenge to the regime on the ground."
But Abdeh argued that was a reason to replace Assad, not tolerate him. The US wanted "a more seasoned and pragmatic politician than Bashar" to confront the Islamists, he claimed.
Allaf disagreed.
"The Americans are buying into the deluge argument," she said. "They have stopped hinting at regime change. I think a number of countries are telling them this is not the time -- even the Israelis. It's in their interest to have a weakened Syria, a Syria on its knees, but not a Syria in chaos."
If all else fails, Assad could offer a deal involving concessions on Iraq, Lebanon and support for Palestinian militants.
But while that might satisfy the US, it could be too much for his Alawite godfathers. In that case, regime change may come not from without but from within.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry