The government's intent to fingerprint all citizens applying for identification cards has been ruled unconstitutional by the Council of Grand Justices. This ruling protects the basic human rights of the Taiwanese people. These rights will not be given short shrift due to political pressure, and cannot be downgraded for administrative convenience. If the Ministry of the Interior wishes to persist in building a biometric database to help maintain law and order, then the law will first have to be amended, or a new law passed.
To be sure, public concerns about a breakdown in law and order are legitimate. One only has to turn on the TV or open the newspaper to see how prevalent crime is. Numerous opinion polls have shown people's thirst for better security, to the extent that they are even willing to sacrifice their rights in exchange for more effective crime prevention and law enforcement.
But human rights groups have rightly raised questions over the government's push to establish a comprehensive national fingerprint database. They point out that the government already has more than 7 million sets of prints on file. And they ask: What if the implementation of the national database fails to reduce crime? Will it then be necessary to collect more biometric data? When people have handed over fingerprints, retinal scans and DNA, no action will escape the government's notice. This might lead to zero crime, but everyone would live in fear of constant surveillance by the authorities. Is this the life that we want?
The constitutional ruling has not put a stop to the possibility of a national fingerprint database. But based on the ruling, it will be difficult for the ministry to establish such a database by linking it with the Household Registration Law (
The Grand Justices are not opposed to improving law and order. But they feel that the ministry has overlooked important issues in its headlong rush to improve crime-fighting. Believing that fingerprints are the solution, the ministry has totally ignored issues of data security, the incomplete state of related laws and the need to improve investigative ability.
The Grand Justices' ruling does not deal with whether data should be taken from just the thumbs or all 10 fingers. Rather, it underscores the larger need to strike a proper balance between security and human rights. Though these will always be in tension, there is no reason why they cannot coexist. The ruling expresses the belief that building a fingerprint database -- a move which could profoundly affect people's lives -- cannot simply be rammed through under an article of the Household Registration Law for administrative convenience.
But the government could draft a bill that specifically deals with the use of biometric data and puts strict limits on the collection, management and use of that data. Such a law could pass constitutional muster with the Grand Justices, and create a win-win situation in which the demands of both human rights and law enforcement are met.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.