It remains unclear as to the exact motive behind Chinese President Hu Jintao's (胡錦濤) latest appeal to US President George W. Bush, when he said: "I hope the US will join the Chinese side in safeguarding peace and stability across the Taiwan Strait and opposing so-called independence."
Oddly, this statement sounds as if Hu was openly inviting the US to "interfere" in China's "internal affairs," a violation of Article 3 of China's earlier enacted "Anti-Secession" law.
It's doubtful that Hu is signaling Beijing's readiness to rescind the Law or admitting that Beijing is having difficulty ironing out differences directly with Taiwan's legally elected officials.
Equally implausible is the notion that China may be hinting at its willingness to engage in a multilateral meeting of the minds.
Far more likely, Beijing is simply trying to placate the US so that it can continue its unencumbered backdoor maneuvering to steal Taiwan with the collaboration of pan-blue camp leaders.
This is in spite of the fact that, as a part of the pan-blue leadership's treachery, the passage of Taiwan's special arms procurement bill has been blocked repeatedly -- a major frustration to US defense officials.
Reportedly, the long-suffering frustration culminated in a highly critical speech delivered on behalf of the Pentagon by Edward Ross, a top official at Defense Security Cooperation Agency.
Ross, during a Taiwan-US Business Council defense industry conference held in San Diego, California recently, said that the US needed to take the matter of the arms procurement impasse to the Taiwanese people.
However, the Taiwanese people -- often the target of international scorn for their reluctance to guard their own homeland -- are the most misunderstood.
For one thing, these are the people who are supposed to defend a country that's not even formally recognized by most of the global community, including the nation's closest allies, the US and Japan.
The Taiwanese people have been asked to maintain a "status quo" which is increasingly in flux and untenable owing in no small measure to the collaboration of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) with Beijing.
Moreover, it has been very difficult for the average Taiwanese to comprehend the US' rationale.
The US has been saying that the future of Taiwan should to be determined by the Taiwanese people, but the US is against Taiwan setting up realistic mechanisms to make full self-determination possible.
And to further confuse the Taiwanese people, the US has successfully thwarted any drive by President Chen Shui-bian's (陳水扁) administration in the last five years toward establishing a normal, sovereign state.
Still, it's not too late for the US to reverse the deterioration in cross-strait relations and help restore confidence to the Taiwanese people.
For instance, the US can reiterate that the promise to aid in Taiwan's defense against aggression -- which is mandated by the Taiwan Relations Act (TRA) -- will remain valid even if Taiwan declares formal independence.
The US can further declare that the existence of the TRA is inexorably linked to the Taiwan's undetermined status.
Any concern that Chen will then become reckless in pursuing Taiwan's formal independence issue would then be unfounded.
Instead, such a declaration by the US would place the burden of avoiding stepping over Beijing's "red line," and thus touching off a war, squarely on his shoulders.
It would make his administration more conservative yet more creative on this issue. Taiwan would then have the confidence and obligation to find the most peaceful way of becoming a broadly recognized sovereign state.
On the other hand, this affirmation of Taiwan's future by the US will immeasurably boost the Taiwanese people's morale.
And, in turn, it will stiffen Taiwan's resolve to defend itself and address US frustration about Taiwan's reluctance to arm itself adequately.
Nevertheless, it might be unrealistic to hope that Bush will take advantage of the rare opportunity offered by Hu's afore-mentioned invitation to meddle in China's "internal affairs."
And unrealistic as well to expect him to give Beijing the following rejoinder: "Yes, the US will join the Chinese side in safeguarding long-term peace and stability across the Taiwan Strait and supporting a peacefully evolving Taiwan independence."
Huang Jei-hsuan
California
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.