What a difference 13 years make. On Sept. 16, 1992, the UK crashed ignominiously out of the European exchange-rate mechanism (ERM), leaving the country's latest attempt to emulate Germany's low-inflation, high growth economy in tatters.
Or so it seemed. The British Conservatives instantly lost their reputation for economic competence and have struggled ever since to regain the mantle. But it is now clear that Black Wednesday (as the day the UK dropped out of the ERM was dubbed) the sharp fall in the UK pound and the new monetary policy arrangements that followed it, set up by the then chancellor of the exchequer (finance minister) Norman Lamont, heralded a golden period of economic achievement for the UK that continues to this day.
There are now, however, signs that the UK economy could be slowing. A leak from the IMF on Sept. 15 showed that it had slashed its growth forecast for the UK to just 1.9 percent next year from the 2.6 percent it had previously pencilled in. Germany's voters, by contrast, were voting this past weekend between parties which have either started to reform the German economy or are promising to do so in a bid to rediscover long-lost growth and jobs.
ILLUSTRAION: YU SHA
The performance of the German economy over the same 13 years has been woeful, with growth coming in at about one-third of the British rate and with unemployment rising close to 5 million, while in the UK it has halved, to 1.4 million, over the same period. Figures out this week showed that the UK has more people in work than ever before.
At current growth rates British GDP could overtake Germany's in the next 10 to 15 years, even though the German population is one-third larger. The German Wirtschaftswunder (economic miracle) of the post-war decades is a distant memory.
Sir Alan Budd, former chief economic adviser to the UK Treasury, who experienced first-hand the UK's entry and exit from the ERM, as well as helping set up the Bank of England's monetary policy committee in 1997, describes the ERM exit as a key moment.
"That gave us a great start and allowed us strong growth with low inflation," he said, referring to the 15 percent fall in sterling that followed the ERM debacle, an event that gave manufacturing exporters a big boost, although the rise in the pound's value after 1996 has hindered manufacturers since.
"But the ERM experience taught us the importance of good policy. And Norman Lamont deserves great credit for very quickly putting in place a brilliant monetary policy system involving regular meetings between the chancellor and the governor of the Bank of England," he said.
He says that now the fundamental differences between the UK and Germany are that the UK has a flexible labor market and is more open to allowing in foreign firms and investors, something which Germany tends to deny itself.
Being in the euro meant Germany was forced to tighten fiscal policy in recent years at a time when the UK was able to run an expansionary fiscal policy as government spending was increased.
Lamont, never a fan of ERM membership, agrees: "Britain has benefited from having a different monetary policy framework, being outside the euro and having a more flexible labor market. The results speak for themselves."
Indeed, the president of the Bundesbank, Axel Weber, said in an interview with the London-based Guardian newspaper last week that Germany had a lot to learn from the UK in that the UK has reformed its labor market extensively over the past two decades and has created a strong and vibrant services sector which has replaced the jobs being lost in the manufacturing sector. Can anyone have imagined a Bundesbank chief saying that 13 years ago?
Lamont warned, however, that the UK should not be too triumphalist.
"A lot of Germany's problems stem from reunification and Germany has a lot of underlying strengths," he said.
His point is reflected in the breakdown of unemployment in the two former Germanies. In west Germany it is around 7 percent, not all that far above the UK's. But it is more than 20 percent in the east. In some eastern towns unemployment is at 35 percent as many young people have headed west in search of work, leaving towns to knock down empty blocks of flats.
Lamont and many London economists point to the fact that German corporate profitability has been rising on the back of a big restructuring and cost-cutting drive by German firms, as well as a surge in exports. That has yet to translate into increased domestic demand, however. And companies that are restructuring are often moving jobs out of Germany, as last week's announcement from Volkswagen that it will cut 10,000 German jobs shows.
Firms have also contributed to a lack of domestic demand in Germany by keeping wage growth very low, something they have achieved by threatening workforces to move jobs abroad.
"Large corporations can decide where to build production lines. Most of the time it is outside of Germany," said Gwyn Hacche, European economist at HSBC.
"This reflects general globalization trends," Hacche said.
Robert Barrie, chief European economist at CSFB, says the labor market reforms Germany has embarked on, combined with corporate restructuring, make him optimistic for the German economy in the medium term, irrespective of who might win this weekend's election.
"Germany's cost competitiveness has improved considerably. But they need to match their labor market reforms with reforms of capital and product markets too," he said.
Budd said it would be a mistake to be smug about the UK's current relative position to Germany.
"Germany has terrific fundamental strengths," he said.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) trip to China provides a pertinent reminder of why Taiwanese protested so vociferously against attempts to force through the cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014 and why, since Ma’s presidential election win in 2012, they have not voted in another Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate. While the nation narrowly avoided tragedy — the treaty would have put Taiwan on the path toward the demobilization of its democracy, which Courtney Donovan Smith wrote about in the Taipei Times in “With the Sunflower movement Taiwan dodged a bullet” — Ma’s political swansong in China, which included fawning dithyrambs