After a three-month adjournment, the second session of the Sixth Legislative Yuan got underway yesterday. Despite the ridicule and criticism that's been leveled at them, our legislators look set to continue neglecting their duties and wasting taxpayers' money. With pressure from the year-end mayoral and county commissioner elections building up, we dare not hope for too much in the new session other than that legislators refrain from embarrassing Taiwan in the international media yet again.
The previous legislative session saw controversy over China's passing of the "Anti-Secession" Law, former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chairman Lien Chan's (連戰) and People First Party Chairman James Soong's (宋楚瑜) China visits, and a transfer of power within the KMT. So we might have expected the current session to be relatively free of sharp political confrontation.
However, after taking up his post as KMT chairman, Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) suddenly changed his stance and opposed the proposed US arms procurement plan after Soong, during a meeting last Wednesday, allegedly recounted comments made to him by Chinese President Hu Jintao (胡錦濤). Soong's eagerness to be Beijing's mouthpiece is shameful, and we also regret that Ma has shown himself unwilling to take responsibility for his political position.
The arms procurement act does not, after all, affect only a single political party. It affects the livelihood and prosperity of all Taiwanese people. If there is any major flaw in the policy, it should be subject to rigorous debate by the government and opposition. Moreover, the public should be made aware of the contents of this policy and its pros and cons. The opposition is wrong to indiscriminately use its legislative majority, blocking the bill on 27 occasions in the procedure committee, so that the bill has never been properly debated before a full sitting of the legislature.
That a policy proposed by the government should give rise to debate with the opposition is a most natural thing in the world's democratic nations. The difference in opinion between the government and the opposition should be subject to open debate and a consensus should be reached, so that the final draft of the bill is one that has the broadest possible public support. This is the real meaning of legislative transparency. At the moment the opposition is practicing a form of violence on the legislative process in using its majority to prevent the bill from even coming before the legislature.
To add insult to injury, this legislation was in fact first formulated under the KMT when it was still in power. So why should it oppose the bill now that it is out of power? And how can Ma, even if he is party chairman, change party policy just on his say-so? Surely this is no different from political blackmail. The hopes of the Taiwanese people that the KMT, under its new chairman, will manage to counter the negative image it has acquired for consistently boycotting policies will likely be disappointed.
One cannot help but feel pessimistic over the current mood in the legislature. If the achievements of the legislature in this new session are similar to the last, in which only 41 bills were passed, then the legislators are clearly in dereliction of their duty, and this will lead to more vociferous public protests. This might even extend to calls for new legislative elections, such as the one made by Premier Frank Hsieh (
We hope that the legislature will prove our pessimism wrong in this new session. We hope that the parties can put aside their feuding, with the pan-blue camp showing its ability to work as a loyal opposition, and the government showing forceful administrative ability, making the legislature a true leader in national development, rather than being a stumbling block.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under