In the four years since the terrorist assaults on the World Trade Center in New York and the Pentagon in Washington, at least two distinct changes in the realm of security have taken place, one that seems to have escaped notice, the other all too evident.
The first is that Muslim extremists have shifted their destructive aim to other Muslims and, to a lesser extent, to Western targets such as London and Madrid, away from the US. There have been no extensive terrorist attacks on the US but Americans cannot be complacent as surely out there somewhere a terrorist is planning an assault that could be as horrific as that of Sept. 11.
The daily deaths of US warriors in Iraq and Afghanistan grab the headlines but by far the greater number of victims of terror are Iraqis, other Arabs and other Muslims in the swath of Islam stretching from Morocco through Saudi Arabia to Indonesia. They are the innocent victims being blown up by car bombs, slain by suicide bombers and assassinated in the dark of night.
Sadly, few Muslim leaders have spoken out to plead for an end to this slaughter. They have been quick to criticize the US for pursuing insurgents in Iraq and Afghanistan but strangely mute in condemning Muslim terrorists for murdering their co-religionists.
SHIFT
Why the apparent shift in targeting? No one knows, because Osama bin Laden and his lieutenants in al-Qaeda don't announce their strategy on Al Jazeera, the Arab TV network. Presumably, the arrest or killing of many of those leaders by the US and its allies, the disruption of terrorist finances and logistics, and the threat of US retaliation have deterred some attacks.
At the same time, US President George W. Bush's "global war on terror," despite some successes, is sputtering. The US remains vulnerable to a terrorist attack with ordinary explosives, chemical and biological weapons, and even a crude nuclear device.
The dithering, disorganized response to Hurricane Katrina is evidence that the US is not prepared for a similar but manmade battering. The lessons that terrorists may have learned from the natural disaster along the Gulf of Mexico can only be speculated.
Most of all, the American people have not been mobilized for the complicated and convoluted war on terror. Airport and airline security have been tightened, but little more has been done to energize Americans, even if Sept. 11 is still fresh in their minds.
It may seem contradictory to note that there have been no large-scale terrorist assaults on the US since Sept. 11 but to contend that Bush's war on terror is faltering.
Consider, however: The president blundered into Iraq with no plan except for a swift military victory, which the forces in the field accomplished handily. Beyond that, his administration has shown no understanding of Iraqi history or culture, no concept of Iraqi politics other than the oppression of Saddam Hussein, no ability to persuade Iraqis and other Arabs of America's good intentions.
Instead, Iraq has become a quagmire, like Vietnam, and Bush, like former US president Lyndon Johnson, seems to have the will neither to mobilize the US to crush the insurgency nor the capacity to find a graceful way out.
RATHOLE
Americans continue to die by the day and taxpayer dollars disappear down a rathole, draining resources that could have been used to fight terror.
In particular, poll after poll has shown that Americans are not mentally and emotionally engaged in the war on terror but are going about their lives almost as if it didn't exist. The president took a five-week vacation, Congress dispersed for the summer, and business, labor and academia have carried on without breaking stride.
For the most part, the only Americans affected by the war have been those in the armed forces, the military reserves called to active duty, and the National Guard units that have been sent to the front, and their families.
James Webb, who served in the Marine Corps in Vietnam, has a scene in his searing novel, Fields of Fire, in which a Marine sergeant returns to Vietnam for a second tour and tells his lieutenant that no one back home seemed to know there was a war on.
"It's like nothing really happened, except to other people," the sergeant says. "It isn't touching anybody except us."
Change Vietnam to Iraq and the war on terror and the scene continues to illuminate.
Richard Halloran is a writer based in Hawaii.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under