I am writing in response to the opinion piece by Nat Bellocchi ("China bound to increase meddling," Sept. 8, page 8).
Few Americans have really considered the Taiwanese issue of any real importance. The truth is, the "courtroom of public opinion" is staffed by a jury with a very short memory. Whether Taiwan goes to war and wins or loses is of little consequence to most of the world, and Taiwan leans solely upon the shoulders of America for guidance. This should stop.
American policy is flexible and changes with each president, and with it the views on Taiwan. However, there is an unwritten, inflexible rule of thumb that the current administration follows, and it has been the same through all previous administrations -- keep the Taiwan issue "undecided."
While Americans are all for freedom, we are no longer so eager to fight for someone else's freedom. Taiwan must assume that it is alone. Too long has the Taiwanese mindset aligned itself with whatever US administration happens to be in charge.
If Taiwan is going to be respected as an independent nation, it must start acting like one, or over time it absolutely will be absorbed by the single-minded machine across the Strait that has been program-med for decades to never give in to Taiwanese statehood.
I am reminded of the common phrase, "Take your best shot, and let the cards fall where they may." Taiwan would do well to consider these words, otherwise it will forever be the rope in a game of tug-of-war between "US interests" and "Chinese unification." The issue of Taiwan, if it is ever to be settled, must be settled by the Taiwanese people, regardless of the consequences for Taiwan-US relations.
Whether or not the US will "be there" for Taiwan needs to be thrown out of the decision-making process. For as long as Taiwan keeps looking over its shoulder for US support, it will never effectively be free.
Taiwan will always be governed by "US interests" or "Chinese reunification" until it makes its own choices. It seems Taiwanese people are content to be ruled by "US interests," but they are still not free.
John Jacksonville
Alabama
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations