In the recent article on the Kuro P2P criminal court decision ("Kuro bosses guilty of IPR violations," Sept. 10, page 1), I was incorrectly quoted as saying that the ruling may help Taiwan get off the US Trade Representative's Watch List next year.
Many industries have recently observed serious problems with Taiwan's inaction on IP cases.
Against this backdrop of apparent backsliding on IP protection promises and the bizarre Ezpeer P2P case decision, I said that this Kuro decision was a positive step that might help keep Taiwan from being downgraded right back to the "Priority Watch" list.
Taiwan had made great progress with intellectual-property protections after its WTO accession, and it's fair to say that all of us who care about these issues were happy to see Taiwan's efforts recognized when it was upgraded from "Priority Watch" to "Watch List" last year.
However, in a very disturbing trend in the months since Taiwan's upgrade, we are getting regular reports of prosecutors and judges refusing to take on intellectual-property cases where clear evidence of infringement has been presented. In this context, the Kuro case decision's tougher sentencing is a bit of good news but simply not enough to justify yet another upgrade.
The protection of intellectual property within Taiwan benefits all concerned. Taiwan's inventors are consistently the fourth most prolific, judging from patent registrations into the US, and strong protections would give confidence to companies considering R&D projects in Taiwan's new technology parks.
Effective trademark enforcement goes to the heart of protecting companies' hard-earned reputations and the common consumers' hard-earned dollars.
Meanwhile, increased protection against counterfeit alcohol-beverage, cosmetic and pharmaceutical products are essential to protecting the health of Taiwan's population. While there was some solid improvement right after the WTO accession, it is absolutely essential that Taiwan continue moving forwards to make this island a center for innovation instead of a well-protected haven for rampant piracy.
John Eastwood
Intellectual Property Rights Committee co-chair, European Chamber of Commerce Taipei
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.