The Ministry of Finance on Friday surprised many with its lack of a decision on the auction of its 28 percent stake in Taiwan Business Bank (
If the ministry thinks it needs more time to evaluate the case because the offers by potential bidders were lower than shares' floor price, and that any decision to sell its holdings based on such low offers would only invite strong criticism for selling state assets too cheaply, the ministry is justified in its actions. But if it regards the delay of a decision as simply a technical issue or a matter of procedure during the auction, it should think twice, because the delay has triggered speculation of under-the-table deals and created unwanted side effects.
Privatization of government assets, especially state-run banks, is always a sensitive issue. The market needs accurate information to make a judgment about the deal. As Taiwan Business Bank is currently experiencing a nationwide work stoppage as employees protest privatization plans -- similar to what happened when Chunghwa Telecom Co (
As it became clear that the ministry was being questioned thoroughly about its postponement, Minister of Finance Lin Chuan (
Thus, the market is full of rumors. Some said that E.Sun Financial Holding Co (
Some have argued that the ministry opened the bid at a time when the legislature is in recess because the ministry didn't want lawmakers to step in and politicize the privatization process. That strategy seems reasonable. What appears beyond the ministry's expectations, however, was that the union's action, said to be the first strike by bank employees in this country, has had an impact on the bidding prices.
This would make Taiwan unlikely to meet its deadline for financial industry consolidation if the government is unwilling to sell its stakes in lenders at prices that will attract bids. Therefore, what the ministry must do to help comfort the market and rebuild investor confidence is to show its determination to privatize state-run banks and resolve the Taiwan Business Bank fiasco as quickly as possible.
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.