The unemployment rate remains at a high level. As victims of factory closure or after relocating to China, many workers have been left without a pension. Military personnel, civil servants, and government-employed teachers, on the other hand, are often better off after retirement as a result of generous pensions or savings, receiving preferential interest rates of 18 percent.
How much better off are these retired military personnel, civil servants and teachers? President Chen Shui-ban (陳水扁) said that if you look around the world, receiving 80 percent of income as a retirement payout is considered extremely high, but in Taiwan, the figure can often exceed 100 percent, to go as high as 120 percent.
This is clearly absurd. Although Chen's intention to introduce reform is admirable, results cannot be expected immediately. It will require across-the-board planning to devise a system that is long-lasting and fair.
Although military personnel, civil servants, and teachers are employed by the government, they are still ordinary workers. But ordinary workers in Taiwan enjoy none of their advantages. Clearly there is a double standard in effect. From the previous Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) regime to today's Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) government, military personnel, civil servants, and teachers have been pampered, while farmers, fishermen and other workers cannot even hope for such treatment. It is not an exaggeration to say that they have been treated as second-class citizens.
The majority of workers have long been dissatisfied with the preferential treatment, monthly pension and 18 percent interest savings that is given to military personnel, civil servants and teachers. In recent years, the deterioration of the economy has meant that these benefits impose a heavy financial burden on the country. If the system is not thoroughly reformed, the government will not be able to bear this burden indefinitely.
Chen recently pointed out that the military personnel and public servants recruited after 1995 are no longer entitled to the preferential savings rate of 18 percent, adding that "there should be an opportunity to reform such a policy even though we cannot abolish it." In this case, the government should draw up a timetable and a comprehensive plan to get the reform off the ground rather than constantly putting it off.
Aside from this preferential interest rate, it is also about time the government reformed the monthly pension enjoyed by retired civil servants.
Nowadays, life expectancy is generally much longer than before as a result of advanced medical treatment and the growing awareness of healthy living. At present, many people who entered the public service in their early twenties are still in the prime of life, but are already eligible for retirement.
Consequently, it will be easy for these people to receive a pension for 20 or even 30 years. This will only lead the nation to face a heavy burden on the financial front and to waste precious human resources, for these people are still able to contribute much to the nation. Instead, the current system encourages former public servants to retire in their prime.
Unfortunately, most of the taxpayers in Taiwan are unable to enjoy this kind of retirement system. We believe that the problem is going to deteriorate into chaos as society gradually ages and the birth rate declines.
Most would not oppose the idea that the government should take care of retired military staff, public servants and public school teachers. However, if their retirement earnings exceed what they could earn when they were working, and also exceed most of the laborers, farmers and fishermen, the general public will become disgruntled if such a system continues to operate.
In principle, public servants are employed by the nation, which means they are also employed by the people. If their performance at work has bettered the life of people, it is reasonable to increase their pay or pensions. In Taiwan, no matter how the economy fares and no matter whether the general public is satisfied with the performance of civil servants, the salary and pensions of government workers simply continue to increase, and are never cut back.
Such a practice runs counter to the principles of a market economy. It is nice to see that these people are affluent; however, such a practice has to be based on a reasonable system.
Establishing a rational and fair system is now a matter of great urgency. The government not only has to conduct a comprehensive review of such a system regarding military personnel, public servants and teachers but also to take into account benefits for the laborers, farmers and fishermen.
In short, the government should not favor a specific group. In the past, civil servants received relatively low salaries, but this was compensated for by offering a favorable retirement system. Nowadays, the salary of the public servants has exceeded those of the private sector.
It is now time to make some adjustments to make the system fairer to all. This will help smooth out the divisions within society. It will be necessary for the government to give such policy reforms serious thought if it is to avoid setting up obstacles for the future.
Translated by Lin Ya-ti and Daniel Cheng
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.