A number of gas stations selling Formosa Petrochemical Corp's (FPC,
As the price of international crude oil has climbed recently, it is understandable that the government would try hard to prevent state-run CPC from raising fuel prices, as the rising costs of gasoline have become a public concern that may introduce higher commodity prices and cause consumers to ratchet down spending, thus hurting the economy overall.
Since CPC is 100 percent owned by the goverment, there's little doubt that the company will continue to serve as an important policy tool to help stabilize commodity prices. But in view of the fact that the two refiners have raised or lowered prices in sync more than 20 times since 2002 (except this time), it's hard to believe that price-fixing is a thing of the past.
This is especially true when the nation's market watchdog, the Fair Trade Commission, is scheduled later this month to release the results of a second-round investigation into whether these two refiners are guilty of price-fixing. In the commission's previous investigation last October, both CPC and FPC were fined NT$6.5 million each for hiking or lowering prices simultaneously. If they were to be confirmed a second time for violating the Fair Trade Act (
What makes people even more angry is that the prices for crude oil futures are soaring, with October contracts trading at US$67.57 a barrel in New York on Friday, while oil purchased by both CPC and FPC will only cost the two companies between US$53 and US$57 a barrel as of the end of October, the Liberty Times reported yesterday, citing an internal document from the Ministry of Economic Affairs. If CPC were to raise its prices, the company should convince consumers of the reasons why and what cost structure its decision is based on.
Still, the gasoline price fiasco last week reminded us of what a brief but more competitive market it was two years ago, when Esso Petroleum Taiwan Inc (
Esso Petroleum, a joint venture between ExxonMobil Corp and Taiwan's Pan Overseas Corp (
Despite the chaotic market that appeared at the time, consumers were the biggest beneficiaries in a market where three players had the best deals on offer. Unfortunately, Esso Petroleum later decided to quit Taiwan, and formally withdrew from this market in December 2003 because of increasing losses. Since then, the market has become an oligopoly, in which CPC and FPC collude and consumers get ripped off.
Demanding a more competitive market in the fuel-retailing business is sometimes considered far-fetched, as tacit agreements are often reached between companies as to when and how much prices will be hiked. But it is both the government and the consumers' responsibility to unwind this tangled skein of collusion and demand fair competition.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations