I have long advocated legislation to support housekeepers and caregivers. I also believe that the government should play a more active role in the issue. Whether the government shoulders responsibility by reviving the system of care through social welfare, or continues to allow market forces dictate the industry (thereby further distorting the policy of obtaining cheap labor), basic regulations are required to protect the interests of housekeepers and caregivers.
Although the government legalized the introduction of foreign domestic workers and caregivers in 1992 as a means of making addressing a shortage of local workers, it failed to enact any labor laws to regulate the employment of these workers.
It simply let the industry be driven by the market, and did not even regulate working hours, the number of days of leave to which each employee is entitled, job scope or working conditions.
Since families with seriously ill patients are often reluctant to allow foreign workers to go on leave, manycaregivers have been victims of the government's dereliction of duty.
Over the years, workers' groups have kept urging the government to enact a household service law. However, the Council of Labor Affairs is favoring using "fixed labor contracts" on the grounds that each situation of employment has different characteristics. If such contracts are used, civic groups attempting to uphold the rights of foreign laborers would not have to solicit support to back up their cause.
When either the employer or the employee violates the regulations stated in the contract, it would become a civil dispute, which has to be settled through court proceedings. Locals are barely able to cope with the time-consuming process of civil litigation, so how can we expect a foreign worker, who might be forced to leave the country any time, to deal single-handedly with such a matter? The proposal to use fixed labor contracts is simply a way of allowing the authorities to shirk their responsibilities, further marginalizing housekeepers and caregivers and lowering their status.
Over the years, both the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) government have failed to play a more active role in solving the issue, but instead allowed management and employees to directly negotiate with one another.
Foreign workers and caregivers have long been isolated and confined. In addition, it is also very difficult for them to access different types of social resources in their capacity as foreign workers. Therefore, the government has to become actively involved and set up regulations so that it has a legal basis for arbitrating disputes. The shortcomings of the industry cannot be left to the mercy of market forces. Before the government takes full responsibility for providing care, it must be able to provide transitional, short-term caregivers so that families with seriously ill patients and caregivers will have time to relax and rest.
The issue is one the government cannot avoid. Before a sound social welfare program comes into play to care for needy families, legislation protecting the basic rights of employees and employers alike is absolutely essential.
Ku Yu-ling is secretary-general of the Taiwan International Workers' Association.
TRANSLATED BY DANIEL CHENG
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.