Japanese Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi may have set the stage for his own undoing by betting his political future on reforming the post office, an issue many voters care little about, analysts say.
Koizumi on Monday called early elections for Thursday, in part to punish defectors in his long-ruling Liberal Democratic Party (LDP), who defeated his plan to privatize Japan Post, which is also the world's largest bank.
But while the issue has consumed him since he was postal minister in 1992 -- Koizumi believes a turn to the free market would help both the post and the economy run better -- many Japanese have other concerns.
"For voters, Koizumi's postal reform is hardly an issue. Voters will be confused about the rationale of the snap election," said Minoru Morita, a well-known political analyst who appears frequently on television.
"If the LDP makes postal reform one of its main campaign platforms, voters will simply ignore it and the party could lose a majority," Morita said.
In 1993, the LDP lost nearly four decades of single-handed rule, spending 10 months in opposition before returning to power through an unlikely alliance with the Socialists.
Now the party is facing an unexpectedly strong challenge from the main opposition Democratic Party, a motley centrist group of former LDP and Socialist lawmakers.
Koizumi has made slitting up the post the center of his domestic agenda, and yesterday said he would punish the LDP defectors who killed the plan in parliament as he tries to rally the party for the election next month.
"I will be merciless. I will decide [candidates] depending only on whether they are against or for the plan to privatize the postal system," he was quoted as saying in the Mainichi Shimbun.
"Koizumi's stubbornness on the postal reforms looks like a folly for voters. Voters will ask, `Why is Koizumi wasting time for an election now?'" said Hiroshi Kawahara, professor of Japanese politics at Tokyo's Waseda University.
"Voters hardly care about the postal reform. They are more concerned about pension reforms, taxes, Iraq and deadlocked talks with North Korea. But this election touches none of them," Kawahara said.
Privatization would have cleared parliament's upper house with up to 17 LDP lawmakers casting dissenting votes. But a staggering 30 LDP members voted against or did not show up for the ballot Monday.
The post office sits on ?355 trillion (US$3.2 trillion) in savings and insurance, effectively making it the world's largest financial institution.
Koizumi believes that breaking it into four entities, including a bank, would give the private sector reason to compete and help Japan out of more than a decade of zero to little growth.
But privatization would likely mean massive job cuts in the postal system while remaining workers would lose job security along with government benefits.
Even so, poll after poll has shown the Japanese public is little interested in the postal reform.
Fewer than one percent of respondents in a July survey by Japan's top-selling daily, the Yomiuri Shimbun, said that privatizing the post was their priority issue.
"The LDP will likely face a very tough election," said Tetsuro Kato, a professor of political science at Hitotsubashi University.
One question is whether New Komeito, a Buddhist-oriented party which provides Koizumi a vital 34 seats in the 480-member lower house, could be tempted to bolt the coalition if the LDP fares poorly.
Koizumi -- who has been in power for more than four years, longer than any Japanese premier in two decades -- vowed he would quit if the LDP and New Komeito together do not secure a majority.
"He is a lame duck. The upcoming election will only confirm the end of the Koizumi government," Kato said.
When I visited Taiwan last summer, I called on the nation to use its status as a technology superpower to build superweapons. It is obvious to me as I return a year later that Taiwan is now answering that call. By 2030, Taiwan envisions a domestic drone hub, capable of producing large quantities of drones per year. The nation continues to tighten cooperation across the private sector, scientific researchers and the elected government, on creating new and innovative production avenues for defense, while efforts to become central to the “democratic supply chain” are only increasing. Anduril is seeing all of these positive
Singaporean former Prime Minister and current senior minister Lee Hsien- Loong(李顯龍) last month stood on Chinese soil and told Beijing that Singapore cooperates because of “shared interests”, not because of common “ethnic descent,” a significant statement that has upended China’s cognitive warfare tactics of “ethnic nationalism.” Along with using its military buildup and economic growth to expand its international dominance, China has long deployed ethnic politics to promote the idea that all ethnic Chinese around the world, regardless of citizenship, share a tight bond with the Chinese motherland, by which it means the regime of the People’s Republic of China (PRC)
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) in San Francisco on Tuesday last week said if she had not met with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), she would have been “just a plain” and “even negligible” KMT chairperson, bluntly signaling the role she is playing in her visit to the US — Beijing’s messenger from Taiwan. Cheng and her delegation arrived in the US on Monday last week for a two-week visit across five major cities. Her party said the group is scheduled to meet with US lawmakers, officials, policy experts and businesspeople. Before departing, Cheng said her trip
In 1935, the German Reich led by the National Socialist Party officially created the Nuremberg Race Laws, a “legal cage”, for German Jews, stripping them of citizenship, criminalizing their personal relationships, barring them from public life, and transforming them into stateless subjects and isolating them from the rest of society. Similarly, in March 2026, the People’s Republic of China (PRC) National People’s Congress adopted the “Promoting Ethnic Unity and Progress” law, which represents the most significant shift in Chinese domestic governance since the era of Mao Zedong (毛澤東). Ostensibly designed as domestic legislation to manage China’s 56 officially recognized ethnic groups,
RSS