The government's plan to privatize Chunghwa Telecom (中華電信) will take another step forward this week when the Ministry of Transportation and Communications sells a 17 percent stake in the company through a planned American Depositary Receipt (ADRs) offering in the US, and a public auction here in Taiwan.
This step doesn't come easily, however, as the sale has already been put off three times since 2003 following months of union opposition and political clashes. When the sale is completed, Chunghwa will gain a more flexible management structure and a larger investment base. And importantly, the government will earn funds needed to reduce its public debt.
The telecommunications liberalization is one of the biggest business issues facing governments worldwide, and countries such as China, France, Germany, Singapore and Finland each undertook privatization programs last year.
In Taiwan, the release of Chunghwa shares is crucial, because the issue will affect not only government revenue -- the sale is estimated to bring in nearly NT$100 billion (US$3.14 billion) to help the government plug its rising budget shortfall -- but also the development of the domestic telecom market, the rights of common investors and the benefits of Chunghwa employees.
As a state-run enterprise, Chunghwa is subject to extensive regulations in accordance with the nation's laws and rules. The company's autonomy is limited by government regulations and legislative oversight, which company executives contend has handicapped the firm's ability to compete with up-and-coming rivals.
Without these limitations, once the company is privatized, Chunghwa said it will increase its management and operational flexibility to more rapidly and efficiently develop its business amid fierce competition that is hurting profits. It is hoped the company can implement cost reduction initiatives in response to changing market conditions.
But this is exactly what the 28,000 workers at Chunghwa are worried about -- the possible losses of jobs and generous pension rights. Meanwhile, critics have also expressed deep reservations about how the government's bid to turn its majority stake into private hands will negatively affect telephone and Internet users in rural areas, where such services are generally deemed unprofitable for private telecom operators.
The legislature also feared privatization would take away its powers of control, and has passed four resolutions since May 2003 to ban the sale of Chunghwa shares, with some lawmakers even petitioning the New York Stock Exchange and the Securities and Exchange Commission in the US to stop it.
It is in this enviornment that Chunghwa has moved back and forth along its privatization course since the government started offloading its shares of the company in 2000. While signs of recovering equity markets have helped boost the government's enthusiasm for pressing on with privatization of Chunghwa -- it has announced it will complete this task by the end of the year -- political squabbling is always a hindrance.
Workers in the union are entitled to bargain for what they want with the management, because that is their right. Critics are justified to air their concerns over the future telecom development in this nation. Lawmakers also have good reasons to worry about possible unfair competition between Chunghwa Telecom -- which already enjoys unparalleled leadership in fixed-line, wireless and Internet services due to its state-run, dominant role -- and other telecom operators as a result of a lack of legislative supervision.
But these people should be reminded that any deal will work better than continued government control of Chunghwa. The company's union has, predictably, threatened strikes protesting the upcoming share sales.
These parties need to calm down. What Taiwan needs is to allow the sale to proceed as scheduled, and the government must work to monitor it to ensure that privatization turns out for the best.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under