With China fever spreading, it is not very surprising to see the opposition's negative stance toward the arms procurement bill. The thinking behind these attitudes, that war must be stopped by peaceful means, could endanger Taiwan's position.
The opposition's ultimate goal behind this thinking is to stop China from launching a military attack on Taiwan. That goal is based on three suppositions. First, that foreign forces centered around the US will intervene in a military conflict in the Taiwan Strait, and that this will prevent China from taking action. Second, it is assumed that China lacks the motivation to launch an attack because it is directing all its strength toward economic development. Third, it is argued that as long as Taiwan keeps the US and China at an equal distance, China will not invade Taiwan.
All three suppositions, however, are now being challenged. The greatest challenge to the first supposition of US support is twofold. On the one hand, the war on terror has caused the US to divide its forces, making it impossible for the US to deal with military conflict in other regions. According to the latest report from the Rand Organization in the US, the permanent US military presence in Iraq and Afghanistan has overstretched US forces, which means that very few troops are ready to respond to crises in other regions. In short, it is questionable whether the US has the power to stop a military conflict in the Taiwan Strait.
The other side of this challenge is a result of the US' strategic miscalculation of the Iraqi invasion, which has led to its neglect of China's growth. This means that the cost of military intervention may erode the US' determination to undertake such action. This is similar to the British strategic miscalculation during the Boer War at the turn of the previous century which led to the rise of Germany.
The challenge to the second supposition that China is preoccupied with its own economic growth is a result of faulty reasoning. Ever since the days of Deng Xiaoping (
Perhaps the most likely catalyst is China's energy needs. According to the US' recent report on China's military power, China relies on imports for 40 percent of its oil needs, and that figure will increase to 80 percent by 2025. This means that continued economic development requires that China guarantee its energy supply.
The oil field issue in the East China Sea is the reason China is now playing tough with Japan. The Taiwan Strait is surrounded by areas involved in sovereignty disputes, including the South China Seas, the East China Sea and the Diaoyutai islands, which are all potentially rich in oil and natural gas. With China playing it tough with Japan, what are the chances that it will be softer on Taiwan?
The third supposition forms the central idea in blue-camp thinking, although history is full of examples disproving this reasoning. During the Peloponnesian War in ancient Greece, Athens requested the help of Milos in its resistance against Sparta. Milos refused the request and was annihilated by Athens.
During World War II, Hitler devised an operation is which he would station 50 divisions along the eastern border of Switzerland in an attempt to annex it. In the end, Switzerland's complex topography, its militia and solid engineering works put an end to the German army's ambitions.
These two examples show us the impact of major states on small nations trying to maintain a neutral foreign policy, and that it is not at all certain that they will succeed.
The weakness of these three suppositions refutes the foundation of the position that war should be averted through peaceful means, but it does not mean that we should stop striving for peace in the Taiwan Strait.
What is important is that we have sufficient military strength to ward off China even if outside powers are unable to intervene and that we are able to deter China from invading. This is the only way to guarantee peace in the Taiwan Strait. The Swiss strategy is a worthy model.
Eugene Yen is a doctoral candidate in the department of political science at National Chengchi University.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations