Mimicking other think-tanks, the Taiwan Institute of Economic Research (TIER,
The TIER said the reduction was mainly due to weaker-than-expected second-quarter performance, when GDP growth slowed to 2.06 percent following a 2.54 percent increase in the first quarter. But the institute said the economy has good momentum heading into the second half of the year, predicting a 4.16 percent growth this quarter and 4.36 percent in the final quarter.
The TIER said a higher growth rate of 3.50 percent remains possible for this year if the government's NT$80 billion flood prevention budget is passed by the legislature and is implemented during the final quarter. Critics, however, argue that the latest GDP forecast just shows how difficult it is for the government to secure the targeted 4 percent growth rate for this year.
The debate over whether the government can achieve the 4 percent target is only meaningful to politicians, as they use the number to blame each other for jeopardizing the nation's economic development. They should be reminded that we don't need the myth of high annual GDP growth -- which usually stood above 8 percent before 1990 -- to build up confidence because the nation's economy has gradually matured in its development course.
But the factors that prompted the lowering of the GDP forecasts should sound alarm bells. The fast-shrinking trade surplus during the first six months through June due to the continued relocation of Taiwanese manufacturers abroad, to China in particular, was the driving force behind the lowered forecasts.
Taiwanese companies have relocated to China faster than most of their Asian competitors because of a shared culture and language. According to government statistics, export orders totalled NT$3.67 trillion in the first half of the year, up 10.86 percent from a year earlier. But the amount of exports clearing customs in the same period increased by a mere 0.63 percent to NT$2.819 trillion, reflecting a growing trend that our manufacturers are taking orders here but producing their goods in China and other countries. Consequently, the nation's trade surplus dropped a whopping 96.19 percent to NT$4.645 billion during the same period.
Obviously, excessive investment in China has made Taiwan overly dependent on its arch rival, so much so that it is now a matter of national security. It is justified, then, that President Chen Shui-bian (
Fortunately, there are signs that capital inflows from high-tech companies in the Central Taiwan Science Park, mainly due to the emerging liquid-crystal-display panel manufacturing, are growing. In the last two years, the capital inflows totalled NT$760 billion worth investment from some 70 companies, suggesting that companies will decide where they want to go as long as the investment environment is good.
Perhaps more importantly, policymakers should understand what caused the trade surplus to decline, in addition to rising oil prices and slower export growth. Does a smaller trade surplus mean the nation is losing its ability to compete on the world market? Will the worsened balance of trade lead to lower national income and affect the exchange rate of the New Taiwan dollar? Only when policymakers truly understand these problems will we believe they are treating the symptoms with the right medicine.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations