The timing of China's decision last week to revalue its currency and allow it to fluctuate against a basket of currencies came as a surprise, despite widespread expectations that it would eventually happen. The move does not, however, mark a complete end to China's decade-old peg to the US dollar, but rather the start of a new currency regime.
The announcement by the People's Bank of China of the revaluation caught most people off-guard, as the news was released on Thursday evening when most Asian foreign exchange markets were closed. But it was also in line with expectations, given increasing international pressure from Beijing's major trading partners that the undervalued currency gives China an unfair advantage.
Now that China has made the first step in a series of adjustments to its exchange rate, market reaction has shifted to wild speculation over what further measures or changes will come, as well as the extent to which China will allow its currency to appreciate over the longer term. In fact, Beijing's smaller-than-expected step has only created expectations for even greater changes and further room for the yuan to appreciate -- and even more capital inflows.
As anticipated, the yuan's revaluation also lifted the New Taiwan dollar, the Korean won and most Asian currencies on Friday. The local currency gained almost 1 percent to close at NT$31.648, while the won soared 1.4 percent to close at 1,021.30. But experts are sceptical that this will last, saying that the currency markets, especially in Taipei, might be overreacting.
According to statistics provided by the nation's central bank, Taiwan's trade surplus dropped by a hefty US$3.47 billion, or 89 percent, to US$425 million, during the first half of the year from a year earlier. The surplus is much lower than Japan's US$42.59 billion, China's US$39.69 billion, Korea's US$12.82 billion and Singapore's US$7.34 billion during the same period of time, suggesting there's room for the NT dollar to depreciate, not appreciate.
Meanwhile, many Taiwanese businesspeople appear confident that the change in the yuan's value will not hurt their operations in China, since a 2 percent rise in operating costs there is tolerable.
A preliminary study by the Ministry of Economic Affairs also suggests that the change will have a limited impact on the economy. But as the yuan is expected to appreciate further in the future, the ministry warned that, over the longer term, it may cause companies in Taiwan to advance their investments in China, creating another wave of capital outflows and hurting the nation's export-oriented economy.
These concerns are not unfounded. The latest ministry statistics show that around 40.5 percent of Taiwan's export orders for last month were produced overseas, up from 31 percent a year earlier and 22.43 percent in June 2003. Taiwanese manufacturers are continuing to shift production offshore, especially to China, to lower their production costs. The yuan's revaluation therefore may accelerate, not stall, company relocations overseas, creating more problems such as unemployment here in Taiwan.
While the impact of the yuan's 2 percent revaluation will take time to assess, the issue of potential capital outflows to China from Taiwan has also caught the attention of the Mainland Affairs Council. Last week the Cabinet said it would monitor the potential impact on the export sector and help small and medium-sized enterprises hedge against the risk of currency fluctuations.
As China is run by an opaque regime, its next move regarding the yuan cannot be predicted. For democratic economies such as Taiwan, the change in the yuan's value has become a regional and global issue we have to face.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with