Having been bothered by A. M. Cambronne's groundless accusations against me, I forwarded my essay ("Taiwan belongs to the Taiwanese," July 7, page 8) and Cambronne's response to the "anonymous American professor" I referred to in my piece.
The person wrote back, "I do not know what language Cambronne speaks, but it must not be English since he clearly misinterprets your comments on the `anonymous American professor.' Incidentally, I guess I had better remain anonymous."
Clearly, I did not denounce my colleague in my original writing. What must be crystal clear to readers is that I did denounce the Chinese Communist government for brainwashing its people. Unfortunately, Cambronne chose to ignore that part. Why?
Like me, Cambronne has the right to interpret the 1951 San Francisco Peace Treaty. I'll not comment any further. Readers can also read the opinion piece jointly-written by Roger Lin and Richard Hartzell ("Recover Taiwan's post-war position," July 15, page 8.) Lin and Hartzell argued for US sovereignty over Taiwan. Readers can decide for themselves which version of the three interpretations they prefer.
Finally, I question Cambronne's sincerity when he wrote, "While I would highly espouse Taiwanese autonomy, you cannot point to documents such as the San Francisco Peace Treaty, the Treaty of Peace with Japan nor Article 77 B of the UN Charter for a resolution of the matter. When you misinterpret a legal document, you set a dangerous precedent for further abuse and misinterpretation of Taiwan's legal documents."
Are the Taiwanese supposed to thank him for that offer? Under China's system, there are a small number of autonomous regions, including Tibet and Xinjiang. In addition, Hong Kong and Macau are defined as Special Administrative Regions.
Informed readers know well that Tibetans and Xinjiang Uighurs are not happy under the Chinese rule, while the people of Hong Kong and Macau are not better off today under Beijing's rule than when they were under British or Portuguese rule.
In any case, the overwhelming majority of the people of Taiwan have rejected Beijing's "one country, two systems" principle under which Hong Kong and Macau are governed. The reality is Taiwan has acted like a sovereign nation and all its representatives, including the president, are directly elected by the voters. Cambronne surely knows that "autonomy" is far from "independence."
What then makes Cambronne think that the freedom-loving Taiwanese people would be appreciative of his meaningless gesture of support?
Chen Ching-chih
San Marcos, California
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry