The principle "keep politics out of sports" is probably possible to abide by in most countries, but it is a nightmare to apply in Taiwan. Faced with China's relentless oppression, Taiwan has failed to maintain its dignity at international sports meets, even agreeing not to use its national flag and anthem so that it can participate in the Olympic Games.
This might be understandable if it were only other countries that humiliated us, but the fact is that certain homegrown officials and educators are the prime culprits with their trampling on the nation's dignity. Whenever Chinese government officials or teams visit Taiwan, this bunch of sycophants bend over backwards to avoid causing offense.
The National Council of Physical Fitness and Sports is reportedly going to change Taiwan's national title to "Chinese Taipei" for the William Jones Cup international basketball invitational that the council has held for almost 30 years. The "Republic of China," "ROC" and "Chunghua team" will be removed from the tournament's regulations. Nor will the national flags of any participating teams be displayed. The purpose of these changes is to avoid upsetting a women's basketball team from China's Zhejiang Province -- participating for the first time -- for fear that it may boycott the event.
Is it really so important for Chinese basketball teams to visit Taiwan? Must the council respect the sensitivities of participating nations to the extent that it demeans itself? It is hoped that the claim of the deputy secretary-general of the basketball association, Wang Jen-sheng (王人生), is true when he says that the whole thing is simply a misunderstanding. Even so, if Taiwanese officials show so little self-respect when hosting international events, then there are hardly grounds to protest when the International Olympic Committee or other groups amend this nation's title as it sees fit, nor can there be a case for demanding that the proper name of this country be reinstated.
Soccer fans will remember the 9th Asian Women's Soccer Championships that were held in Taipei in 2001. On that occasion, Taipei Mayor Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) -- who styles himself as a defender of the "Republic of China" -- ordered that the national flag not be displayed either inside or outside the Zhongshan Soccer Stadium where the event was held in deference to the sensitivities of the visiting team from China. While police were ordered to confiscate any ROC flags brought by spectators, China's team were allowed to flaunt the flag of the People's Republic of China (PRC). Ma has form on this score.
It was hardly surprising, therefore, that last month the Hsiuping Institute of Technology removed the national flag and a portrait of Sun Yat-sen (孫逸仙) in order not to offend delegates from China who were attending the institute's graduation ceremony. Worse still, this grovelling took place in front of students and parents.
At last month's annual general meeting of Lions International in Hong Kong, organizers decided against the showing of any national flags during the event, but because of pressure from Beijing, the PRC flag was still used at one activity. Beijing is clearly willing to do anything to affirm its sovereignty on the international stage. Taiwan's officials, in contrast, fall over themselves to be self-effacing, even at events which they host.
Can such cowardice possibly win the respect of nations that compete on Taiwanese soil?
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with